Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add installation of MuJoCo plugins as part of CMake installation logic #1515

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

traversaro
Copy link
Contributor

@traversaro traversaro commented Mar 15, 2024

Some users in my lab found confusing the fact that simulate did not found the plugins out of the box if mujoco was built from source, and apparently also other users had the same confusion (see for example #723 (comment)).

This PR hopefully simplifies this by also installing as part of the CMake install step the mujoco plugins in ${CMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX}/bin/mujoco_plugin, exactly where simulate expects to find them, and where they are placed in the official release binaries.

At the moment, I did not include this modifications for the case in which MUJOCO_BUILD_MACOS_FRAMEWORKS is ON, as it is not really clear to me how this should be handled. However, when building by source MUJOCO_BUILD_MACOS_FRAMEWORKS is set to OFF, so for all users that build from source, this PR ensure that the installed simulate will be able to find all the mujoco plugins out of the box.

fyi @francesco-romano

@@ -79,6 +79,30 @@ else()
endif()

option(MUJOCO_BUILD_MACOS_FRAMEWORKS "Build libraries as macOS Frameworks" OFF)
option(MUJOCO_INSTALL_PLUGINS "Install MuJoCo plugins" ON)
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Do you mind making exactly the same changes to SimulateOptions.cmake?

SimulateOptions.cmake is used for SIMULATE_STANDALONE here:

include(SimulateOptions)

and the two files should be kept in sync.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks, done and rebased.

Just an OT curiosity, if the two files must be kept in sync, there is any reason why we can't use the same MujocoOptions.cmake directly in mujoco/simulate/CMakeLists.txt, for example using include(../cmake/MujocoOptions.cmake) instead of include(SimulateOptions) ? Indeed inclusion of a file in a sibling directory is a bit ugly, but perhaps it would be easier to manage then two files that need to be manually kept in sync (unless you have something on the Google side to keep them in sync, in that case probably the problem is just for external contributors).

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Internally they are just one file that gets split in our CI so ya, this is a problem we save specifically for external contributors 🙂

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Annoyingly it looks like copybara still refuses to ingest this 😠

@nimrod-gileadi should I just copy-paste this into a CL?
Alternatively we could implement @traversaro's proposal to do the file duplication/referencing in cmake rather than copybara?

I'll approve yet again, maybe it'll work... 🤷‍♂️

@saran-t
Copy link
Member

saran-t commented May 20, 2024

I'm back at work now. Will see if we can finally get this merged.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants