Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Frontend] [Core] perf: Automatically detect vLLM-tensorized model, update tensorizer to version 2.9.0 #4208

Merged
merged 33 commits into from
May 13, 2024

Conversation

sangstar
Copy link
Contributor

@sangstar sangstar commented Apr 19, 2024

Automatically detect vLLM-tensorized model, update tensorizer to version 2.9.0

This PR accomplishes several things:

  • Updates docstrings to account for tensorizer refactor in [Core] Refactor model loading code #4097 in the tensorize_vllm_examples.py example script, and slight corrections to the docstrings of the new, refactored functions.
  • Allows models to be automatically inferred as a vLLM-tensorized model. Accomplishes this by placing a meta-tensor "footprint" in the serialized model, and removing it at runtime. vllm_tensorized as an arg has been removed.
  • Updates tensorizer to the full release of 2.9.0.

PR Checklist (Click to Expand)

Thank you for your contribution to vLLM! Before submitting the pull request, please ensure the PR meets the following criteria. This helps vLLM maintain the code quality and improve the efficiency of the review process.

PR Title and Classification

Only specific types of PRs will be reviewed. The PR title is prefixed appropriately to indicate the type of change. Please use one of the following:

  • [Bugfix] for bug fixes.
  • [CI/Build] for build or continuous integration improvements.
  • [Doc] for documentation fixes and improvements.
  • [Model] for adding a new model or improving an existing model. Model name should appear in the title.
  • [Frontend] For changes on the vLLM frontend (e.g., OpenAI API server, LLM class, etc.)
  • [Kernel] for changes affecting CUDA kernels or other compute kernels.
  • [Core] for changes in the core vLLM logic (e.g., LLMEngine, AsyncLLMEngine, Scheduler, etc.)
  • [Hardware][Vendor] for hardware-specific changes. Vendor name should appear in the prefix (e.g., [Hardware][AMD]).
  • [Misc] for PRs that do not fit the above categories. Please use this sparingly.

Note: If the PR spans more than one category, please include all relevant prefixes.

Code Quality

The PR need to meet the following code quality standards:

  • We adhere to Google Python style guide and Google C++ style guide.
  • Pass all linter checks. Please use format.sh to format your code.
  • The code need to be well-documented to ensure future contributors can easily understand the code.
  • Include sufficient tests to ensure the project to stay correct and robust. This includes both unit tests and integration tests.
  • Please add documentation to docs/source/ if the PR modifies the user-facing behaviors of vLLM. It helps vLLM user understand and utilize the new features or changes.

Notes for Large Changes

Please keep the changes as concise as possible. For major architectural changes (>500 LOC excluding kernel/data/config/test), we would expect a GitHub issue (RFC) discussing the technical design and justification. Otherwise, we will tag it with rfc-required and might not go through the PR.

What to Expect for the Reviews

The goal of the vLLM team is to be a transparent reviewing machine. We would like to make the review process transparent and efficient and make sure no contributor feel confused or frustrated. However, the vLLM team is small, so we need to prioritize some PRs over others. Here is what you can expect from the review process:

  • After the PR is submitted, the PR will be assigned to a reviewer. Every reviewer will pick up the PRs based on their expertise and availability.
  • After the PR is assigned, the reviewer will provide status update every 2-3 days. If the PR is not reviewed within 7 days, please feel free to ping the reviewer or the vLLM team.
  • After the review, the reviewer will put an action-required label on the PR if there are changes required. The contributor should address the comments and ping the reviewer to re-review the PR.
  • Please respond to all comments within a reasonable time frame. If a comment isn't clear or you disagree with a suggestion, feel free to ask for clarification or discuss the suggestion.

Thank You

Finally, thank you for taking the time to read these guidelines and for your interest in contributing to vLLM. Your contributions make vLLM a great tool for everyone!

@sangstar
Copy link
Contributor Author

sangstar commented Apr 22, 2024

@Yard1 @ywang96

Some QoL improvements for tensorizer and some corrected docstrings (as per the great refactor from @Yard1), and an update for tensorizer as version 1.9.0 is officially released. No longer need to specify if a model is vLLM-tensorized beforehand, as I've implemented a way for this to be inferred implicitly by registering a meta tensor into the model during serialization with a vllm-tensorized-marker and removing it during deserialization.

@sangstar
Copy link
Contributor Author

Further made some improvements with documentation. Important fixes explaining how to use tensorizer with the refactored changes (as the example script predates the refactor) so hoping to get eyes on this! Cheers :D
@ywang96 @Yard1

@ywang96
Copy link
Collaborator

ywang96 commented May 4, 2024

Will take a look once I have some bandwidth - thanks for the continuous contribution to vLLM!

@ywang96 ywang96 self-assigned this May 4, 2024
…-update

# Conflicts:
#	requirements-dev.txt
#	setup.py
#	tests/tensorizer_loader/tensorize_vllm_model_for_testing.py
Copy link
Collaborator

@ywang96 ywang96 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you @sangstar for the continuous contribution! I left some questions.

examples/tensorize_vllm_model.py Show resolved Hide resolved
vllm/model_executor/model_loader/loader.py Show resolved Hide resolved
@sangstar sangstar requested a review from ywang96 May 12, 2024 13:02
@sangstar
Copy link
Contributor Author

@ywang96 Resolved comments! Let me know if anything else is needed.

…-update

# Conflicts:
#	vllm/model_executor/model_loader/loader.py
@sangstar sangstar requested a review from ywang96 May 13, 2024 19:48
@sangstar
Copy link
Contributor Author

sangstar commented May 13, 2024

@ywang96 Resolved comments!

Copy link
Collaborator

@ywang96 ywang96 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🚀 LGTM!

@sangstar
Copy link
Contributor Author

@ywang96 Checks passed and ready to merge! 😄

@ywang96 ywang96 merged commit 8bc68e1 into vllm-project:main May 13, 2024
55 checks passed
@sangstar sangstar deleted the sangstar/tensorizer-update branch May 14, 2024 14:04
robertgshaw2-neuralmagic pushed a commit to neuralmagic/nm-vllm that referenced this pull request May 19, 2024
dtrifiro pushed a commit to dtrifiro/vllm that referenced this pull request May 21, 2024
tybalex pushed a commit to rubra-ai/vllm that referenced this pull request May 25, 2024
mawong-amd pushed a commit to ROCm/vllm that referenced this pull request Jun 3, 2024
triple-Mu pushed a commit to CC-LLM/vllm that referenced this pull request Jun 5, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants