Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[STABLE-v2.2] topology1: tgl: add Waves-integrated topology builds #9252

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jun 25, 2024

Conversation

johnylin76
Copy link
Contributor

Adds topology builds with Waves codec integrated for Intel TGL Google devices.

The default names for Waves bytes control are different betweeen
tgl-012-drop-stable and cavs2.5-001-drop-stable. For the purpose of
keeping config API constant during branch migration, this commit
aligns the control names backward for TGL topology builds only.

Signed-off-by: Pin-chih Lin <[email protected]>
Adds topology builds with Waves codec integrated for TGL usage.

Signed-off-by: Pin-chih Lin <[email protected]>
@marc-hb marc-hb changed the title topology1: tgl: add Waves-integrated topology builds [STABLE-v2.2] topology1: tgl: add Waves-integrated topology builds Jun 21, 2024
@cujomalainey
Copy link
Member

@johnylin76 these are cherry picks from main right?

@marc-hb
Copy link
Collaborator

marc-hb commented Jun 21, 2024

@cujomalainey I don't about this specifically but I know that most (if not all) Intel topology1 has been deleted from the main branch.

@johnylin76
Copy link
Contributor Author

That's correct. topology1 is no longer lived on mainstream. From my understanding the branch stable-v2.2 plays the role of mainstream for IPC3 platform builds, e.g. cavs2.5-001-drop-stable, so the attempt is first-landing on stable-v2.2, then cherry-picking on cavs2.5-001-drop-stable.

@lgirdwood
Copy link
Member

Internal CI west is not used on stable -v2.2 branch so can be ignored.

@lgirdwood lgirdwood merged commit 7cedb3e into thesofproject:stable-v2.2 Jun 25, 2024
20 of 22 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants