Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

rTorrent: Network configuration suggestion #1016

Draft
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: develop
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

stickz
Copy link
Contributor

@stickz stickz commented May 22, 2023

This commit suggests implementation of a 4MB send and receive buffer for TCP sockets to improve throughput on gigabit connections. It explains why they are disabled by default on rTorrent and how much memory is consumed.

It also adds a missing configuration variable for per torrent upload slots. The default value of 50 is applied.

This commit suggests implementation of a 4MB send and receive buffer for TCP sockets to improve throughput on gigabit connections. It explains why they are disabled by default on rTorrent and how much memory is consumed.

It also adds a missing configuration variable for per torrent upload slots. The default value of 50 is applied.
throttle.max_uploads.global.set = 100
throttle.min_peers.normal.set = 1
throttle.min_peers.seed.set = -1
trackers.use_udp.set = yes

# Disabled by default becuase these will override Linux Kernel settings
# Suggested to configure on a per application basis to improve throughput
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Remove 43-46 and link to documentation instead.

Also this is not my suggestion nor the opinion of other maintainers as many users have server oriented kernel configs installed during their setup.

I would allow wording closer to "you may wish to configure..." In the docs article that will be linked to, so as to not potentially confuse users into thinking they blindingly need to apply configs they may not understand but could potentially override other pre-configured defaults as shipped by their provider.

@stickz stickz marked this pull request as draft May 24, 2023 10:50
@stickz
Copy link
Contributor Author

stickz commented May 24, 2023

This pull request is marked a draft for now. I will return it when time permits.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants