[Feature Request]: Read binary data (bytes) #12878 #13017
+165
−3
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
dosubot
bot
added
the
size:L
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
This change addresses the feature request outlined in issue #12878. It introduces functionality to read binary data (bytes) uploaded by users, providing a method to handle various file types without physically storing them. The motivation behind this change is to facilitate working with in-memory databases, catering to scenarios where storing files on a server is not desirable due to privacy concerns or organizational policies.
Fixes # (issue)
New Package?
No
Version Bump?
Yes
Type of Change
New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
How Has This Been Tested?
Added new unit/integration tests
Suggested Checklist:
I have performed a self-review of my own code
I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
I ran make format; make lint to appease the lint gods