Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on May 26, 2022. It is now read-only.
/ react-scopes Public archive

Intuitive & scalable state management system powered by reactive stores, scopes logic & flux architecture

License

Notifications You must be signed in to change notification settings

rscopes/react-scopes

Repository files navigation

react-scopes

Flexible State management system based on flux architecture, stores data components & inheritable scopes

Build Status

What's react-scopes ?

RS is a simple to use & flexible state management system inspired by ReactJS methods.
Quickly said, RS allow linking, scoping, and sequencing multiples async-able stores while remaining in a serializable flux architecture.

RS Stores look like "React components for data".
Basically, they render determined data according theirs current state & propagate these data to the listening stores state .

Scopes ?

At first, scopes are like stores that would compose their state & data basing on the active stores they contain.
But they were made for flexibility so they have 3 "scalability dimensions" :

  • They can contain hierarchically named scopes
  • They can have parent scope ( in the js prototypes way )
  • And they can have "mixed" scopes

Note

RS use a similar states data processing structure than React Hooks & Contexts;
Main difference is RS atomically manage memo/state triggering & results propagation where Hooks just re-execute the memoizers graph every renders.

That's said, Hooks are simplier & have ways to achieve almost the same behaviors; so even if RS is pretty stable RS dev is stopped.
*actually there only decorators style injecters

Minimal doc here

Samples here

Simplified & limited sample :

import React       from "react";
import RS, {asRef, Scope} from "react-scopes";

const appScope = new Scope({

        // Here a simple store definition ( only instantiated if used )
        @RS.store
        config: {
        	// simple props define the initial state
            apiUrl: "https://somewhere.com",
            
            // functions defines actions
            // ( action return mutations / updates for the store state )
            changeApiUrl:({apiUrl})=>({apiUrl}),
            
            // when the state of this store change 
            // the $apply function update or replace the store result data
            // This resulting data object is the "public" value of this store
            // It *should* be predictable basing the state object for good async SSR  
            $apply(data={}, state, changesInState){
            	data.apiUrl = state.apiUrl+"/api";
            	return data;
            }
        },
    });

// Any App instance will use the same "appScope" Scope instance 
@RS(appScope)
class App extends React.Component {
    render() {
    	// MyComp will inherit appScope
        return <MyComp active={true}/>
    }
}

// Here; RS will instantiate the following scope definition 
// with any instance of the "MyComp" React Component 
@RS(
    {
        @RS.store
        master: {
            go: false,
        },
        @RS.store
        test  : {
        	// @asRef allow defining "references" to any reachable store in the scope
        	// Here "config" exist in the parent scope ("appScope") 
            @asRef
            config: "config",
            
            @asRef
            activateQuery: "master.go",
            
            // the $apply fn can update the data object using both sync and async methods
            $apply( data = {}, state, { activateQuery } ) {
                if ( activateQuery ) {
                	// All stores can call this.wait() & this.release()
                	// Quickly said, this.wait(optionalTokenForDebug) 
                	// will make this store & parent scope "unstable"
                	// so the store will not push result data to the listening stores
                	// when this.release(optionalTokenForDebug) is called the result data of the store is propagated
                    this.wait();
                    setTimeout(
                        tm => {
                            this.push({ state: "stable", value: "#asyncData2" });
                            this.release();
                        }, 500
                    );
                    return ({ state: "querying", value: undefined });
                   
                }
                return data;
            }
        },
        @RS.store
        test2 : {
            @asRef
            config: "config",
            @asRef
            activateQuery: "master.go",
            
            // Another async method consist on updating the data object dynamically
            $apply( data = {}, state, { activateQuery } ) {
                if ( activateQuery ) {
                    this.wait(); 
                    setTimeout(
                        tm => {
                            data.state = "stable";
                            data.value = "#asyncData1";
                            this.release();
                        }, 550
                    );
                    data.state = "querying";
                    data.value = undefined;
                }
                return data;
            }
        }
    }
)
// bind this.props.active values to master.go
@RS.fromProps("active:master.go")
// bind test & test2 to the props ( & mount any required store ) 
@RS.connect("test", "test2")
class MyComp extends React.Component {
    render() {
        let { test, test2 } = this.props;
        return <div className={'target'}>{test.value}-{test2.value}</div>
    }
}

Notes

RS seems semantically & functionally stable.
It's free of memory leaks & have correct perfs.

That's said RS was not written trying to be the faster/cleaner system one shot, but to :

  • Have better scalability ( by making complex components independent )
  • Easily define & reuse async data process
  • Make async SSR
  • Avoid using tons of independents libs to manage the app state
  • Easily serialize & restore full or partial app state
  • etc

RS use a similar states data processing structure than React Hooks & Contexts;
Main difference is RS manage memo/state triggering & results propagation where Hooks juste re-execute the memoizers graph every renders.

About decorators

( well, like code-decorators )

These are stage-0 decorators because while the decorators spec has changed and is now stage-2, no transpiler has yet to implement these changes and until they do, this library won't either. Although the TypeScript documentation uses the phrase "Decorators are a stage 2 proposal for JavaScript" this is misleading because TypeScript still only implements the stage-0 version of the spec, which is very incompatible with stage-2 (as of this writing). If you concretely find that a compiler (babel, TS, etc) implement stage-2+, please do link me to the appropriate release notes! 🎈

This can be consumed by any transpiler that supports stage-0 of the decorators spec, like babel.js version 5. Babel 6 does not yet support decorators natively, but you can include babel-plugin-transform-decorators-legacy or use the applyDecorators() helper.

Related packages

rScopes link the following packages :

ReScope : rescope
ReScope HOCs, decorators & tools : rescope-spells

Buy Me A Coffee

*