Correcting docs about "No access rules" #12
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
no_acs_rules -> (no)acsrules
no_acs_rules -> (no)acsrules
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I'm configuring ntfs3 on my PC (Ubuntu 22.04), and found param
no_acs_rulesin/etc/fstableads to emergency mode. Later I found this mail indicating it has changed to(no)acsrulesandnoacsrulesin/etc/fstabworks.I think it is necessary to fix the doc in time to prevent newbies (like me :D) from wrecking their devices by following the official docs. This is just a simple fixup and may needs further improvement.