Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jul 27, 2023. It is now read-only.

HH-157725 add path and responseCode parameters to ClientEventCallback interface methods #464

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

rogoza-igor
Copy link

Hi!
We overloaded ClientEventCallback interface methods to be able to path some additional information (path and responseCode) to implementation. This information can be useful for example for monitoring.

/**
* @deprecated use {@link #onHttpRequestSuccess(String, String, String, String, int)} instead.
*/
@Deprecated(forRemoval = true)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is is ok to use Java 9 style @deprecated in this project?

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Deleted forRemoval attribute

public void httpRequestSuccess(Request request, Response<?> response) {
EVENT_EXECUTOR.submit(() -> {
callback.onHttpRequestSuccess(clientName, request.method(), request.url().query());
callback.onHttpRequestSuccess(clientName, request.method(), request.url().encodedPath(), request.url().query(), response.code());
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I wonder, is it good to have both callbacks executed?

Maybe it would be better to call the old deprecated method in new default one:

default void onHttpRequestSuccess(String clientName, String method, String path, String queryString, int responseCode) {
        // Kept for compatibility at the moment
        onHttpRequestSuccess(clientName, method, queryString);        
}

Then replacing calls here would still keep the backwards compatibility?

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, it's good idea, thank you!

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants