Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Add TI funding request to TAC decision process doc #329

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
May 22, 2024
Merged

Add TI funding request to TAC decision process doc #329

merged 2 commits into from
May 22, 2024

Conversation

marcelamelara
Copy link
Contributor

@marcelamelara marcelamelara commented May 16, 2024 •
edited

This PR adds a line to the TAC decision process to reflect the TI funding request TAC review process (per the doc).

I should note that the TI funding process doc only says "a majority of the TAC" is needed for approval, so the current # of approvals is set to the basic majority. Happy to change it to 7 if others feel strongly about needing TAC quorum to review funding requests.

@marcelamelara marcelamelara added the Content Updates/additions to TAC content. A change to the process. Must include a changelog entry. label May 16, 2024
@marcelamelara marcelamelara requested a review from a team as a code owner May 16, 2024 22:54
SecurityCRob
SecurityCRob approved these changes May 17, 2024
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Contributor

@SecurityCRob SecurityCRob left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks! +1

@SecurityCRob
Copy link
Contributor

This PR adds a line to the TAC decision process to reflect the TI funding request TAC review process (per the doc).

I should note that the TI funding process doc only says "a majority of the TAC" is needed for approval, so the current # of approvals is set to the basic majority. Happy to change it to 7 if others feel strongly about needing TAC quorum to review funding requests.

Personally, I am fine with a majority. As elected and appointed folks, this is one of our most important duties to perform, so I hope that everyone would do their best to make time to review and comment on funding things.

lehors
lehors approved these changes May 17, 2024
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Contributor

@lehors lehors left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM. Thanks!

@SecurityCRob
Copy link
Contributor

with this being a new "Content" labeled item, can we get the changelog.md file also updated?

@marcelamelara
Copy link
Contributor Author

with this being a new "Content" labeled item, can we get the changelog.md file also updated?

Yep, can do! I was waiting for the other PR to be merged.

@marcelamelara marcelamelara force-pushed the decision-process-ti-funding-request branch from 21d2365 to 6ca5b84 Compare May 22, 2024 18:11
@SecurityCRob SecurityCRob merged commit 8f21001 into ossf:main May 22, 2024
4 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@lehors lehors lehors approved these changes

@SecurityCRob SecurityCRob SecurityCRob approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
Content Updates/additions to TAC content. A change to the process. Must include a changelog entry.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet
3 participants
@marcelamelara @SecurityCRob @lehors