Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Alex/cos 3315 email notification on marking invoice paid incorrect #7307

Conversation

alexopenline
Copy link
Contributor

@alexopenline alexopenline commented May 27, 2024

Proposed changes

Changes

What types of changes does your code introduce? Put an x in the boxes that apply

  • Bugfix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Code style update (formatting, renaming)
  • Refactoring (no functional changes, no API changes)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)
  • Build related changes
  • Documentation Update (if none of the other choices apply)
  • Other (please describe below)

Additional context

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Introduced notifications for "Invoice Payment Received" events.
    • Added dynamic subject lines for invoice payment received notifications.
  • Enhancements

    • Improved email subject customization based on user-triggered events.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented May 27, 2024

Walkthrough

The recent changes introduce a new workflow event for handling invoice payment receipts. This includes adding constants for the event and its subject line, updating the Postmark provider to generate file names for this event, and modifying the invoice event handler to incorporate user-triggered event metadata and dynamically set email subjects.

Changes

Files Change Summary
packages/server/customer-os-common-module/notifications/notification_provider.go Added a new constant WorkflowInvoicePaymentReceived.
packages/server/customer-os-common-module/notifications/subject_lines.go Added a new constant WorkflowInvoicePaymentReceivedSubject with the value "Payment Received for Invoice %s from %s".
packages/server/events-processing-platform-subscribers/notifications/postmark.go Added support for generating file names for the WorkflowInvoicePaymentReceived event in GetFileName method.
packages/server/events-processing-platform-subscribers/subscriptions/invoice/invoice_event_handler.go Added eventMetadata struct with UserId, logic to handle user-triggered events, and adjusted email subject setting.

Sequence Diagram(s) (Beta)

sequenceDiagram
    participant User
    participant InvoiceHandler
    participant NotificationService
    participant PostmarkProvider

    User->>InvoiceHandler: Triggers Invoice Payment Event
    InvoiceHandler->>InvoiceHandler: Process Event Metadata
    InvoiceHandler->>NotificationService: Send Notification Request
    NotificationService->>PostmarkProvider: Generate File Name for WorkflowInvoicePaymentReceived
    PostmarkProvider-->>NotificationService: Return File Name
    NotificationService-->>User: Notification Sent

"In code's vast fields, new constants bloom,
For payments received, they lift the gloom.
With subjects clear and files named right,
Notifications soar, a coder's delight.
From handler's hands to Postmark's flight,
Invoice events now shine so bright."

((_/))
(='.'=)
(")
(")

Tip

New Features and Improvements

Review Settings

Introduced new personality profiles for code reviews. Users can now select between "Chill" and "Assertive" review tones to tailor feedback styles according to their preferences. The "Assertive" profile posts more comments and nitpicks the code more aggressively, while the "Chill" profile is more relaxed and posts fewer comments.

AST-based Instructions

CodeRabbit offers customizing reviews based on the Abstract Syntax Tree (AST) pattern matching. Read more about AST-based instructions in the documentation.

Community-driven AST-based Rules

We are kicking off a community-driven initiative to create and share AST-based rules. Users can now contribute their AST-based rules to detect security vulnerabilities, code smells, and anti-patterns. Please see the ast-grep-essentials repository for more information.

New Static Analysis Tools

We are continually expanding our support for static analysis tools. We have added support for biome, hadolint, and ast-grep. Update the settings in your .coderabbit.yaml file or head over to the settings page to enable or disable the tools you want to use.

Tone Settings

Users can now customize CodeRabbit to review code in the style of their favorite characters or personalities. Here are some of our favorite examples:

  • Mr. T: "You must talk like Mr. T in all your code reviews. I pity the fool who doesn't!"
  • Pirate: "Arr, matey! Ye must talk like a pirate in all yer code reviews. Yarrr!"
  • Snarky: "You must be snarky in all your code reviews. Snark, snark, snark!"

Revamped Settings Page

We have redesigned the settings page for a more intuitive layout, enabling users to find and adjust settings quickly. This change was long overdue; it not only improves the user experience but also allows our development team to add more settings in the future with ease. Going forward, the changes to .coderabbit.yaml will be reflected in the settings page, and vice versa.

Miscellaneous

  • Turn off free summarization: You can switch off free summarization of PRs opened by users not on a paid plan using the enable_free_tier setting.
  • Knowledge-base scope: You can now set the scope of the knowledge base to either the repository (local) or the organization (global) level using the knowledge_base setting. In addition, you can specify Jira project keys and Linear team keys to limit the knowledge base scope for those integrations.
  • High-level summary placement: You can now customize the location of the high-level summary in the PR description using the high_level_summary_placeholder setting (default @coderabbitai summary).
  • Revamped request changes workflow: You can now configure CodeRabbit to auto-approve or request changes on PRs based on the review feedback using the request_changes_workflow setting.

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to full the review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@alexopenline alexopenline force-pushed the alex/cos-3315-email-notification-on-marking-invoice-paid-incorrect branch from 29b8884 to 233d97c Compare May 27, 2024 07:31
@alexopenline alexopenline marked this pull request as ready for review May 27, 2024 07:31
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

Review Details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 0bb6c9b and 233d97c.
Files selected for processing (4)
  • packages/server/customer-os-common-module/notifications/notification_provider.go (1 hunks)
  • packages/server/customer-os-common-module/notifications/subject_lines.go (1 hunks)
  • packages/server/events-processing-platform-subscribers/notifications/postmark.go (1 hunks)
  • packages/server/events-processing-platform-subscribers/subscriptions/invoice/invoice_event_handler.go (3 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (2)
  • packages/server/customer-os-common-module/notifications/notification_provider.go
  • packages/server/customer-os-common-module/notifications/subject_lines.go
Additional comments not posted (3)
packages/server/events-processing-platform-subscribers/notifications/postmark.go (1)

170-171: LGTM! Ensure that the new workflow ID WorkflowInvoicePaymentReceived is integrated correctly across all relevant parts of the system.

Verification successful

The new workflow ID WorkflowInvoicePaymentReceived is integrated correctly across the codebase. The usages in invoice_event_handler.go, notification_provider.go, and subject_lines.go are consistent and align with the intended functionality.

  • packages/server/events-processing-platform-subscribers/subscriptions/invoice/invoice_event_handler.go
  • packages/server/customer-os-common-module/notifications/notification_provider.go
  • packages/server/customer-os-common-module/notifications/subject_lines.go
Scripts Executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify integration of the new workflow ID `WorkflowInvoicePaymentReceived`.

# Test: Search for the usage of `WorkflowInvoicePaymentReceived` across the codebase. Expect: Consistent usage in relevant parts.
rg --type go $'WorkflowInvoicePaymentReceived'

Length of output: 914

packages/server/events-processing-platform-subscribers/subscriptions/invoice/invoice_event_handler.go (2)

41-43: The addition of the eventMetadata struct is appropriate for capturing user context in event handling.


1029-1035: The conditional logic to set the email subject and workflow ID based on the event trigger source is correctly implemented.

Comment on lines +962 to +965
evtMetadata := eventMetadata{}
if err := json.Unmarshal(evt.Metadata, &evtMetadata); err != nil {
tracing.TraceErr(span, err)
}
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Consider handling potential errors from JSON unmarshalling to ensure robustness.

- if err := json.Unmarshal(evt.Metadata, &evtMetadata); err != nil {
+ if err := json.Unmarshal(evt.Metadata, &evtMetadata); err != nil {
+   tracing.TraceErr(span, err)
+   return errors.Wrap(err, "json.Unmarshal evt.Metadata")
+ }

Committable suggestion was skipped due low confidence.

@edifirut edifirut merged commit ca10fa6 into otter May 27, 2024
39 checks passed
@edifirut edifirut deleted the alex/cos-3315-email-notification-on-marking-invoice-paid-incorrect branch May 27, 2024 08:45
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants