-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Alex/cos 3315 email notification on marking invoice paid incorrect #7307
Alex/cos 3315 email notification on marking invoice paid incorrect #7307
Conversation
WalkthroughThe recent changes introduce a new workflow event for handling invoice payment receipts. This includes adding constants for the event and its subject line, updating the Postmark provider to generate file names for this event, and modifying the invoice event handler to incorporate user-triggered event metadata and dynamically set email subjects. Changes
Sequence Diagram(s) (Beta)sequenceDiagram
participant User
participant InvoiceHandler
participant NotificationService
participant PostmarkProvider
User->>InvoiceHandler: Triggers Invoice Payment Event
InvoiceHandler->>InvoiceHandler: Process Event Metadata
InvoiceHandler->>NotificationService: Send Notification Request
NotificationService->>PostmarkProvider: Generate File Name for WorkflowInvoicePaymentReceived
PostmarkProvider-->>NotificationService: Return File Name
NotificationService-->>User: Notification Sent
Tip New Features and ImprovementsReview SettingsIntroduced new personality profiles for code reviews. Users can now select between "Chill" and "Assertive" review tones to tailor feedback styles according to their preferences. The "Assertive" profile posts more comments and nitpicks the code more aggressively, while the "Chill" profile is more relaxed and posts fewer comments. AST-based InstructionsCodeRabbit offers customizing reviews based on the Abstract Syntax Tree (AST) pattern matching. Read more about AST-based instructions in the documentation. Community-driven AST-based RulesWe are kicking off a community-driven initiative to create and share AST-based rules. Users can now contribute their AST-based rules to detect security vulnerabilities, code smells, and anti-patterns. Please see the ast-grep-essentials repository for more information. New Static Analysis ToolsWe are continually expanding our support for static analysis tools. We have added support for Tone SettingsUsers can now customize CodeRabbit to review code in the style of their favorite characters or personalities. Here are some of our favorite examples:
Revamped Settings PageWe have redesigned the settings page for a more intuitive layout, enabling users to find and adjust settings quickly. This change was long overdue; it not only improves the user experience but also allows our development team to add more settings in the future with ease. Going forward, the changes to Miscellaneous
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configration File (
|
29b8884
to
233d97c
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 1
Review Details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (4)
- packages/server/customer-os-common-module/notifications/notification_provider.go (1 hunks)
- packages/server/customer-os-common-module/notifications/subject_lines.go (1 hunks)
- packages/server/events-processing-platform-subscribers/notifications/postmark.go (1 hunks)
- packages/server/events-processing-platform-subscribers/subscriptions/invoice/invoice_event_handler.go (3 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (2)
- packages/server/customer-os-common-module/notifications/notification_provider.go
- packages/server/customer-os-common-module/notifications/subject_lines.go
Additional comments not posted (3)
packages/server/events-processing-platform-subscribers/notifications/postmark.go (1)
170-171
: LGTM! Ensure that the new workflow IDWorkflowInvoicePaymentReceived
is integrated correctly across all relevant parts of the system.Verification successful
The new workflow ID
WorkflowInvoicePaymentReceived
is integrated correctly across the codebase. The usages ininvoice_event_handler.go
,notification_provider.go
, andsubject_lines.go
are consistent and align with the intended functionality.
packages/server/events-processing-platform-subscribers/subscriptions/invoice/invoice_event_handler.go
packages/server/customer-os-common-module/notifications/notification_provider.go
packages/server/customer-os-common-module/notifications/subject_lines.go
Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify integration of the new workflow ID `WorkflowInvoicePaymentReceived`. # Test: Search for the usage of `WorkflowInvoicePaymentReceived` across the codebase. Expect: Consistent usage in relevant parts. rg --type go $'WorkflowInvoicePaymentReceived'Length of output: 914
packages/server/events-processing-platform-subscribers/subscriptions/invoice/invoice_event_handler.go (2)
41-43
: The addition of theeventMetadata
struct is appropriate for capturing user context in event handling.
1029-1035
: The conditional logic to set the email subject and workflow ID based on the event trigger source is correctly implemented.
evtMetadata := eventMetadata{} | ||
if err := json.Unmarshal(evt.Metadata, &evtMetadata); err != nil { | ||
tracing.TraceErr(span, err) | ||
} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Consider handling potential errors from JSON unmarshalling to ensure robustness.
- if err := json.Unmarshal(evt.Metadata, &evtMetadata); err != nil {
+ if err := json.Unmarshal(evt.Metadata, &evtMetadata); err != nil {
+ tracing.TraceErr(span, err)
+ return errors.Wrap(err, "json.Unmarshal evt.Metadata")
+ }
Committable suggestion was skipped due low confidence.
Proposed changes
Changes
What types of changes does your code introduce? Put an
x
in the boxes that applyAdditional context
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Enhancements