Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: migrate GetValue SetValue (GHI-1933) #17909

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: development
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

pollend
Copy link
Member

@pollend pollend commented May 11, 2024

What does this PR do?

I migrated the rest of the Get and set values for the node. wonder if this abstraction could be simplified a bit. All these separate overloaded functions seem kind of cumbersome. some kind of container seems more appropriate though. I was thinking of maybe something with a variant?

How was this PR tested?

ref: #9133

@pollend pollend requested review from a team as code owners May 11, 2024 20:01
}
}

//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
void CCompoundSplineTrack::SetValue(float time, const Vec4& value, bool bDefault, bool applyMultiplier)
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

would need to test CCompoundSplineTrack and see if missing anything. quaternions between AZ and cry_quat are different. I forget how though?

@byrcolin byrcolin added the sig/content Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Content. label May 14, 2024
@pollend pollend force-pushed the feat/migrate-rest-GetValue-SetValue-GHI-9133 branch from c7e9867 to 686d724 Compare May 22, 2024 14:46
@pollend pollend force-pushed the feat/migrate-rest-GetValue-SetValue-GHI-9133 branch from 686d724 to 387dfbd Compare June 8, 2024 13:51
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
sig/content Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Content.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants