Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

wip: std skelleton (missing d2n function; help!) #433

Draft
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

blaggacao
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

Comment on lines 5 to 15
app = {
source = inputs.src;
projects = {
prettier = {
name = "prettier";
subsystem = "nodejs";
translator = "yarn-lock";
};
};
};
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Help, please! 🙏 — This needs to be a derivation. How would I do that?

@blaggacao blaggacao changed the title wip: std skelleton (missing d2n function) wip: std skelleton (missing d2n function; help!) Dec 24, 2022
}: {
default = cell.packages.app;
app =
# a terrible idea
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This could work but completely destroys the harmony 😃

But I don't think this is the right way. There must be a better way.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Currently, we do not have a less terrible interface ;)
I plan to re-design this completely
I recently created a collaborative document to discuss how the new drem2nix API should look like.
Feel free to collaborate and dump your ideas there: https://pad.lassul.us/UswFgE39SDuvRcT3R7irNQ?view

To summarize it. I plan to change dream2nix to not provide any functions itself, and instead only export modules for drv-parts. After this, everything will evolve around individual derivations instead of flakes. Composing multiple packages to something like a flake will then be up to the user.

Copy link
Contributor Author

@blaggacao blaggacao Dec 29, 2022

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ok, that is frankly extremely promising.

I engaged in a round of (extensive) comments trying to fully cover my stakeholder perspective as a:

  • DevOps persona operating on the intersection of Ops, Build & DevX along the entire SDLC.
  • Horizontal Integration Framework maintainer (i.e. std) addressing the SDLC wholistically.

I'll reproduce the question about potential output contracts for Standard BlockTypeActions to consume (drv-parts contracts vs d2n contracts) also here in github: DavHau/drv-parts#1

})
.packages
.${inputs.nixpkgs.system}
.default;
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

You might want to pick prettier here instead of default. Sometimes the default might not point to what you want. The heuristic is a bit poor as of now.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants