[bug] fix ut TestAddressManager

[volgariver6]

What type of PR is this?

• API-change
• BUG
• Improvement
• Documentation
• Feature
• Test and CI
• Code Refactoring

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

issue #15759

What this PR does / why we need it:

fix ut TestAddressManager

[matrix-meow]

@volgariver6 Thanks for your contributions!

Pull Request Review:

Title:

The title of the pull request is clear and concise, indicating that it is fixing a bug related to the TestAddressManager.

Body:

The body of the pull request provides information about the type of PR (BUG), the specific issue it fixes (issue #15759), and the reason for the PR, which is to fix the TestAddressManager.

Changes:

1. In pkg/proxy/handler.go:

   • Added logging of connection ID and session ID in the handle function.

2. In pkg/util/address/address.go:

   • Modified the Register method signature to return an integer.
   • Updated the Register method implementation to return an integer.

3. In pkg/util/address/address_test.go:

   • Updated the test cases for AddressManager to reflect the changes made in the Register method.

Feedback and Suggestions:

1. Return Value in Register Method:

   • The change in the Register method signature and implementation to return an integer is not clear in terms of its purpose. It seems unnecessary and could potentially introduce confusion.
   • Suggestion: Unless there is a specific requirement for the Register method to return an integer, it would be better to revert it to its original form without a return value to maintain consistency and clarity.

2. Test Case Optimization:

   • The test cases in address_test.go have been updated to accommodate the changes in the Register method. However, the test logic for finding an available port in the test seems convoluted.
   • Suggestion: Instead of dynamically finding an available port in the test, consider using fixed port values for testing to ensure consistency and reliability. This will simplify the test setup and make it easier to understand.

3. Error Handling in Tests:

   • In the test case for finding an available port, there is a lack of proper error handling when attempting to listen on a port. This could lead to unexpected behavior in the test.
   • Suggestion: Implement robust error handling in the test case to handle potential errors when attempting to listen on a port. This will ensure that the test behaves predictably and fails gracefully when necessary.

4. Code Comments:

   • The code changes lack inline comments to explain the rationale behind the modifications. Adding comments can help improve code readability and make it easier for other developers to understand the changes.
   • Suggestion: Include descriptive comments above the modified code sections to explain the purpose and context of the changes.

5. Security Considerations:

   • Ensure that the changes made do not introduce any security vulnerabilities, especially when dealing with network operations like listening on ports. Validate input parameters and handle errors securely to prevent potential security risks.
   • Suggestion: Conduct a thorough security review of the code changes to identify and address any security concerns before merging the pull request.

By addressing the mentioned points and considering the suggestions provided, the quality and maintainability of the codebase can be improved.