Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

remove bvt tag of snapshot restore #15870

Merged
merged 15 commits into from May 11, 2024
Merged

Conversation

YANGGMM
Copy link
Contributor

@YANGGMM YANGGMM commented May 7, 2024

What type of PR is this?

  • API-change
  • BUG
  • Improvement
  • Documentation
  • Feature
  • Test and CI
  • Code Refactoring

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

issue #14784

What this PR does / why we need it:

remove bvt tag

@matrix-meow matrix-meow added the size/S Denotes a PR that changes [10,99] lines label May 7, 2024
@mergify mergify bot added the kind/test-ci label May 7, 2024
@matrix-meow
Copy link
Contributor

@YANGGMM Thanks for your contributions!

Pull Request Review:

Title:

The title of the pull request is clear and concise, indicating the specific action being taken.

Body:

The body of the pull request provides relevant information about the type of PR, the issue it fixes, and the purpose of the changes made.

Changes:

  1. The changes involve the removal of the @bvt:issue#14784 tag from multiple SQL files in the snapshot directory.

Feedback and Suggestions:

  1. Redundant Tags Removal:

    • The removal of the @bvt:issue#14784 tag seems to be the primary focus of this pull request. It's essential to remove redundant or unnecessary tags to maintain code cleanliness.
    • Suggestion: Since the @bvt:issue#14784 tag is being removed from multiple files, it's recommended to ensure that this tag is no longer needed for any testing or tracking purposes. If it's no longer relevant, the removal is appropriate.
  2. Consistency in Changes:

    • It's good practice to ensure consistency in the changes made across all affected files.
    • Suggestion: Double-check all files to confirm that the @bvt:issue#14784 tag has been removed uniformly from each file where it was present.
  3. Security Consideration:

    • While the changes made in this pull request seem focused on removing a specific tag, it's crucial to ensure that no sensitive information or security vulnerabilities are introduced or exposed during this process.
    • Suggestion: Conduct a thorough review to verify that the removal of the tag does not inadvertently expose any sensitive data or introduce security risks.
  4. Optimization:

    • The changes in this pull request are straightforward, but it's always beneficial to optimize the process where possible.
    • Suggestion: If there are other similar tags or redundant elements in the codebase, consider addressing them in the same PR to improve overall code quality and maintainability.
  5. Documentation Update:

    • It's essential to update any relevant documentation or comments to reflect the changes made in the code.
    • Suggestion: If there are any documentation files or inline comments referencing the removed tag, ensure they are also updated or removed accordingly.
  6. Testing Validation:

    • After the removal of the tag, it's crucial to validate that the functionality of the affected code remains intact.
    • Suggestion: Run relevant tests to confirm that the removal of the tag does not impact the expected behavior of the system.

By addressing the points mentioned above, you can ensure that the codebase remains clean, secure, and well-maintained after the removal of the @bvt:issue#14784 tag.

@YANGGMM YANGGMM changed the title remove bvt tag remove bvt tag of snapshot restore May 8, 2024
@mergify mergify bot merged commit 9998d12 into matrixorigin:main May 11, 2024
18 of 19 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
kind/test-ci size/S Denotes a PR that changes [10,99] lines
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants