Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

[Tech Request]: refactoring hashbuild operator using message #15967

Open
2 tasks done
badboynt1 opened this issue May 10, 2024 · 1 comment
Open
2 tasks done

[Tech Request]: refactoring hashbuild operator using message #15967

badboynt1 opened this issue May 10, 2024 · 1 comment
Assignees
@badboynt1
Labels
kind/tech-request New feature or request
Milestone
1.2.1

Comments

@badboynt1
Copy link
Contributor

badboynt1 commented May 10, 2024 •
edited

Is there an existing issue for the same tech request?

  • I have checked the existing issues.

Does this tech request not affect user experience?

  • This tech request doesn't affect user experience.

What would you like to be added ?

remove hashmap from batch.
hashmap don't need to copy among join probes. 
optimize this to save memory

Why is this needed ?

No response

Additional information

No response
@badboynt1 badboynt1 added the kind/tech-request New feature or request label May 10, 2024
@badboynt1 badboynt1 mentioned this issue May 10, 2024
Closed
7 tasks
@badboynt1 badboynt1 self-assigned this May 10, 2024
This was referenced May 14, 2024
Merged
Merged
@badboynt1 badboynt1 changed the title [Tech Request]: optimize hashmap dup [Tech Request]: refactoring hashbuild operator using message May 14, 2024
@badboynt1 badboynt1 mentioned this issue May 15, 2024
Merged
7 tasks
@daviszhen daviszhen added this to the 1.2.1 milestone May 16, 2024
@daviszhen
Copy link
Contributor

要等16021 做完。

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@badboynt1 badboynt1

Labels
kind/tech-request New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Milestone
1.2.1
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@daviszhen @badboynt1