Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
Add some open questions to the RPC transition plan
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history
  • Loading branch information
seancolsen committed Apr 9, 2024
1 parent 402fe88 commit 512ed2f
Showing 1 changed file with 8 additions and 0 deletions.
8 changes: 8 additions & 0 deletions docs/projects/2024/architecture-transition/rpc.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -90,6 +90,14 @@ We use snake_case for Python variables and camelCase for JavaScript variables. T

If we were starting from scratch, Sean would have a preference for moving this case transformation into an automated step that would happen somewhere like middleware. Being that we're _kind of_ starting from scratch with this new RPC API, is it worth considering adopting a case transformation step like this? Sean thinks it's _probably not_.

### Namespace depth

How likely do we think it is that we'll end up having more deeply-namespaced method names like `foo.bar.delete`?

### Error types

On the frontend, do we want to leverage the type system to encode error structure on a per-function basis?

## API Standards

These standards are _preliminary_ and subject to change. We'll need to better document them as they become more solidified with our rollout.
Expand Down

0 comments on commit 512ed2f

Please sign in to comment.