Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Framework :: Jupyter PyPI Trove Classifier; gh topics, links of Notebook, Hub, Lab, BinderHub #22

Open
wants to merge 3 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

westurner
Copy link
Contributor

This adds a number of bare links.
I think the bare links (links without anchor text) are justified because:

  • it's easier to remember which URLs I've read when the name of the document is the URL
  • e.g. org/repo URLs are easier to learn when not having to hover or hold-press each link to remember which is which

I would add them before the fold,
but they may be fine where there are at the end.

I could add TOC entries (or .. contents:: in RST) for each of the projects?

@westurner westurner changed the title Jupyter Notebook, JupyterHub, JupyterLab, BinderHub, GitHub Topics Jupyter Notebook, JupyterHub, JupyterLab, BinderHub, GitHub Topics, PyPI Trove Classifier Jun 15, 2018
@westurner westurner changed the title Jupyter Notebook, JupyterHub, JupyterLab, BinderHub, GitHub Topics, PyPI Trove Classifier Framework :: Jupyter PyPI Trove Classifier; links of Notebook, Hub, Lab, BinderHub Jun 15, 2018
@westurner westurner changed the title Framework :: Jupyter PyPI Trove Classifier; links of Notebook, Hub, Lab, BinderHub Framework :: Jupyter PyPI Trove Classifier; gh topics, links of Notebook, Hub, Lab, BinderHub Jun 15, 2018
@westurner
Copy link
Contributor Author

westurner commented Jun 15, 2018

@markusschanta markusschanta self-assigned this Jun 16, 2018
@markusschanta
Copy link
Owner

Hey, sorry for the slow response. Just looking at this now. Given that master has advanced quite a bit, I'm going to cherry-pick things from this branch into smaller bits. For example the GitHub topics have been merged in with #34.

- Source: https://github.com/jupyter/notebook
- Docs: https://jupyter-notebook.readthedocs.io/en/stable/
- https://github.com/jupyter/jupyter/wiki/A-gallery-of-interesting-Jupyter-Notebooks
- IPython
Copy link
Owner

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Most of the IPython section looks rather stale. The last IPEP is from 2014 and the wiki looks quite dated too. With the split of the Jupyter and IPython projects, the IPython parts seem less relevant to me. What do you think?

@westurner
Copy link
Contributor Author

westurner commented Sep 3, 2018 via email

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants