New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
update ASF APIs, switch SQS to JSON again #10741
Conversation
LocalStack Community integration with Pro 2 files ±0 2 suites ±0 1h 33m 28s ⏱️ + 1m 48s Results for commit cc358d3. ± Comparison against base commit 0da9865. This pull request removes 127 and adds 127 tests. Note that renamed tests count towards both.
This pull request removes 5 skipped tests and adds 6 skipped tests. Note that renamed tests count towards both.
♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results. |
S3 Image Test Results (AMD64 / ARM64) 2 files 2 suites 2m 57s ⏱️ Results for commit cc358d3. ♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results. |
This PR contains a bump of |
4494f1a
to
8a5b52e
Compare
@handler("ValidateStateMachineDefinition", expand=False) | ||
def validate_state_machine_definition( | ||
self, context: RequestContext, request: ValidateStateMachineDefinitionInput, **kwargs | ||
) -> ValidateStateMachineDefinitionOutput: | ||
raise NotImplementedError |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@MEPalma 👀
8a5b52e
to
72b0c10
Compare
FYI: Converted this PR to draft since a downstream pipeline failed on these changes. |
72b0c10
to
010f449
Compare
010f449
to
52dc5d3
Compare
52dc5d3
to
cc358d3
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM! Quite an extensive change again, but hoping this is the last time we have to do the switch! Thanks a lot for taking care of it once again.
I just have a comment regarding a change to an SNS test where we use sns_query
, not too sure if that was necessary or a typo?
Other than that, the pipeline being green gives us the confidence 🚀
🚀 ASF Update Report 🚀
This PR has been automatically generated to update the generated API stubs for our ASF services.
It uses the latest code-generator from the master branch (scaffold.py) and the latest published version of botocore to re-generate all API stubs which are already present in the
localstack.aws.api
module of the master branch.🔄 Updated Services
This PR updates the following services:
👷🏽 Handle this PR
The following options describe how to interact with this PR / the auto-update:
✔️ Accept Changes
If the changes are satisfying, just squash-merge the PR and delete the source branch.
🚫 Ignore Changes
If you want to ignore the changes in this PR, just close the PR and do not delete the source branch. The PR will not be opened and a new PR will not be created for as long as the generated code does not change (or the branch is deleted). As soon as there are new changes, a new PR will be created.
✏️ Adapt Changes
Don't do this. The APIs are auto-generated. If you decide that the APIs should look different, you have to change the code-generation.
⏸️ Pause Updates
Remove the cron-schedule trigger of the GitHub Action workflow which creates these PRs. The action can then still be triggered manually, but it will not be executed automatically.