Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

unify the coding style of using testcontainers #48

Closed
wants to merge 10 commits into from

Conversation

feuyeux
Copy link

@feuyeux feuyeux commented Feb 6, 2024

To unify the coding style of using testcontainers, and improve maturity for logging

@langchain4j
Copy link
Owner

Hey @feuyeux thanks a lot and sorry for the delay with review!
I have noticed that there is also this PR which seems to overlap with yours. Could you please take a look?

@feuyeux
Copy link
Author

feuyeux commented Feb 24, 2024

Hey @feuyeux thanks a lot and sorry for the delay with review! I have noticed that there is also this PR which seems to overlap with yours. Could you please take a look?

Thanks for reply, and I just checked #60 pull request,there're some files changed on both. What I did is let all series of vector dbs to use log instead of system out, for example, and both of use did unify the coding style on testcontainers.

So, I can merge this PR if it approved before mine, with pleasure. Or vice versa, maybe :)

@feuyeux feuyeux closed this Mar 30, 2024
@feuyeux feuyeux reopened this Mar 30, 2024
@feuyeux
Copy link
Author

feuyeux commented Mar 30, 2024

Hey @feuyeux thanks a lot and sorry for the delay with review! I have noticed that there is also this PR which seems to overlap with yours. Could you please take a look?

I found that #60 had merged, and then I just merge with it, please review.

@feuyeux
Copy link
Author

feuyeux commented Apr 18, 2024

@langchain4j Please take a quick look, there's no conflects

@@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
#!/bin/bash
export JDK21_HOME=/usr/local/opt/openjdk/libexec/openjdk.jdk/Contents/Home
Copy link
Owner

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

why is this required?


<dependency>
<groupId>org.testcontainers</groupId>
<artifactId>elasticsearch</artifactId>
Copy link
Owner

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

there is another elasticsearch dep with other version above


<dependency>
<groupId>org.testcontainers</groupId>
<artifactId>neo4j</artifactId>
Copy link
Owner

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

same here.
please double-check all your changes.

@feuyeux
Copy link
Author

feuyeux commented Apr 23, 2024

I just created a new PR, and let's move to #78.

@feuyeux feuyeux closed this Apr 23, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
2 participants