feat: add priority in ClusterColocationProfile

[j4ckstraw]

Ⅰ. Describe what this PR does

• make ClusterColocationProfile support priorty
• add a annotation to skip next profiles.

Maybe you want to only match once, and have priority when you have many clusterColocationProfiles matched, this patch implement it.

Ⅱ. Does this pull request fix one issue?

#1871

Ⅲ. Describe how to verify it

Ⅳ. Special notes for reviews

V. Checklist

• I have written necessary docs and comments
• I have added necessary unit tests and integration tests
• All checks passed in make test

[koordinator-bot]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by:
To complete the pull request process, please assign eahydra, fillzpp after the PR has been reviewed.
You can assign the PR to them by writing /assign @eahydra @fillzpp in a comment when ready.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• apis/OWNERS
• config/OWNERS
• pkg/webhook/OWNERS

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 10.00000% with 9 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 67.29%. Comparing base (22ffeec) to head (9864118).
Report is 88 commits behind head on main.

Files	Patch %	Lines
...webhook/pod/mutating/cluster_colocation_profile.go	10.00%	7 Missing and 2 partials ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #1873      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   67.27%   67.29%   +0.02%     
==========================================
  Files         411      411              
  Lines       45848    45885      +37     
==========================================
+ Hits        30842    30880      +38     
+ Misses      12774    12764      -10     
- Partials     2232     2241       +9     

Flag	Coverage Δ
unittests	67.29% <10.00%> (+0.02%)	⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[stale]

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity.
This bot triages issues and PRs according to the following rules:

• After 90d of inactivity, lifecycle/stale is applied
• After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/stale was applied, the issue is closed
  You can:
• Mark this issue or PR as fresh with /remove-lifecycle stale
• Close this issue or PR with /close
  Thank you for your contributions.

[stale]

This issue has been automatically closed because it has not had recent activity.
This bot triages issues and PRs according to the following rules:

• After 90d of inactivity, lifecycle/stale is applied
• After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/stale was applied, the issue is closed
  You can:
• Reopen this PR with /reopen
  Thank you for your contributions.