Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add icons for more documentation files #643

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

Semphriss
Copy link
Contributor

@Semphriss Semphriss commented Mar 6, 2022

I've noticed that although many common documentation files have a special icon, many others, like SECURITY or CODE_OF_CONDUCT, don't. I propose to add some of them.

Note: As I'm unfamiliar with the selection criteria, I've added rather more icons than less in case they might be interesting; I'm open to leave some of them out if they are considered irrelevant. I saw in #642 that counting files across repositories on GitHub was one criterion; I provided my own findings about those files for convenience:

Filename (none) .md .txt Proposed icon
CODE_OF_CONDUCT 719k 1.2M 2k (New icon)
CODINGSTYLE 72k 3k 839 (New icon)
CODING_STYLE 141k 16k 4k (New icon)
NEWS 6M 165k 454k Same as CHANGELOG
ROADMAP 183k 86k 6k Same as TODO
INSTALL 22M 330k 426k Same as COMPILING
SECURITY 16M 1M 111k (New icon)
AUTHOR 2.4M 27k 26k (New icon)
AUTHORS 5M 659k 666k (New icon)
CREDIT 2.9M 21k 70k (New icon)
CREDITS 1.4M 38k 153k (New icon)

The proposed icons:

  • Code of conduct: code_of_conduct
  • Coding style: code_indent
  • Security: security
  • Authors / credit: user

The current icon selection is only my proposition (and the expression of my poor talents); I am open to change the icons/pairings if requested.

@Semphriss
Copy link
Contributor Author

Is there any interest in this PR? I can fix the conflicts, but if it won't be merged anyways, I can close it instead.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

1 participant