Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Improved: Documentation for new Metafield Sync Flow #568

Open
wants to merge 3 commits into
base: implementations-pub
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

sadhanaa21
Copy link

Updated documentation for new Metafield Sync Flow.

@sadhanaa21 sadhanaa21 requested a review from dt2patel June 11, 2024 14:03

#### To ensure the job runs properly, we need to verify the following:
1. The corresponding custom NiFi flow is running properly.
2. The Moqui service job poll_OMSOrderIdsFeed_ADOC is scheduled.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The Moqui job mentioned here is not very well described in the doc. The name and place in the integration flow needs to be better defined.

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Updated sir

4. **Job Picking and Data Import**:
The transformed file is placed in an FTP location for OMS. The "Packaged Multi-Stream Import" job, located in the Miscellaneous section of the job manager app, retrieves the file and imports the data into OMS.

This workflow ensures efficient synchronization of order meta fields from Shopify to OMS, maintaining data accuracy and consistency.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
This workflow ensures efficient synchronization of order meta fields from Shopify to OMS, maintaining data accuracy and consistency.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants