set, unordered_set, and deque support #28
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I'm not sure if this repo is maintained anymore, but this PR adds support for the standard library
std::deque
,std::set
, andstd::unordered_set
.I'd also like to add support for some additional types which I frequently use, and I'm wondering if this is something that would also be wanted, such as
std::queue
,std::priority_queue
, and possibly the standard types foroptional
andvariant
. If so:std::queue
andstd::priority_queue
do not allow for random access traversal. As such, the only way I can see an implementation for these types is to create a copy and unpeel the copy to access the internal elements. Would this be an acceptable implementation?std::optional
andstd::variant
require C++17 support. Would this be an issue?