Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Removed extraneous 'has' typo #1691

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: 2nd-ed
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Removed extraneous 'has' typo #1691

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Diff view
Diff view
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion scope-closures/ch5.md
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -530,7 +530,7 @@ The term coined by TC39 to refer to this *period of time* from the entering of a

The TDZ is the time window where a variable exists but is still uninitialized, and therefore cannot be accessed in any way. Only the execution of the instructions left by *Compiler* at the point of the original declaration can do that initialization. After that moment, the TDZ is done, and the variable is free to be used for the rest of the scope.

A `var` also has technically has a TDZ, but it's zero in length and thus unobservable to our programs! Only `let` and `const` have an observable TDZ.
A `var` also technically has a TDZ, but it's zero in length and thus unobservable to our programs! Only `let` and `const` have an observable TDZ.

By the way, "temporal" in TDZ does indeed refer to *time* not *position in code*. Consider:

Expand Down