Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Annotation error in the results generated sanger sequencer #76

Open
Scarlet-001 opened this issue Jan 5, 2023 · 4 comments
Open

Annotation error in the results generated sanger sequencer #76

Scarlet-001 opened this issue Jan 5, 2023 · 4 comments
Assignees
Labels
question Further information is requested

Comments

@Scarlet-001
Copy link

The sequencer shows annotation for insertion one bp ahead instead of showing the position before and after the insertion. What could be the possible issue or is that an acceptable annotation?

@tobiasrausch
Copy link
Member

I am not sure what the problem is? Can you please elaborate?

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Apr 13, 2023

I am not sure what the problem is? Can you please elaborate?

I am not an expert in the field and was just doing my internship at a Cancer lab. I will try my best to explain.

Working with sanger is new to me. While analyzing a report we found an insertion that has not been reported in any databases so far, we were working on checking if the insertion is pathogenic or not but when we reanalyzed the sanger annotation through variant reporter of the insertion it was giving it one position ahead and we analyzed that with the VEP as well that is were the confusion started.

The sequencer showed annotation of an insertion not between the bases but a step/position next to it:

c.5532-5533insGAA is the insertion position came after position 32 and before 33 but the sequencer annotates it like c.5533-5534insGAA.

We were working on human genome hg38.

The reason to suspect the error is because considering the error it shows insertion of a codon, between a codon while my instructor suspect that may not be the case considering patient's history. My instructor believed that the insertion point is before the codon not inbetween the codon itself.

And the annotation is in this form [c.33-34insAUU]+[=] and I don't know what the +[=] represents here.

We were confused if it was the error by sequencer or if we didn't know something about the annotations.

@tobiasrausch
Copy link
Member

Usually it's best to then look at the raw chromatogram trace signal. In Indigo the variants are linked to the trace signal plot so you can jump to the position of the variant in the trace.

@tobiasrausch tobiasrausch added the question Further information is requested label Apr 13, 2023
@tobiasrausch tobiasrausch self-assigned this Apr 13, 2023
@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Apr 13, 2023

Usually it's best to then look at the raw chromatogram trace signal. In Indigo the variants are linked to the trace signal plot so you can jump to the position of the variant in the trace.

So should I try using that software? What file should I give as an input? Or should I put the sequence?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
question Further information is requested
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants