Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add 64GiB SDR sector-size #1027

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: beta
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

DrPeterVanNostrand
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

Copy link
Contributor

@vmx vmx left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@DrPeterVanNostrand Please let me know if you are after those comments (as the one inline), or if it only matters that it renders fine.

`$N_{\porepreplicas / k} = 1$`\
`$N_{\postreplicas / k, \winning} = 1$`\
`$N_{\postreplicas / k, \window} = 2349$`\
The number of challenged replicas per PoRep, Winning PoSt, and Window PoSt partition proof.
`$N_{\postreplicas / k, \window} = \big[ \hspace{1pt} \ell_\sector^\byte = 32\ \text{GiB} \mathbin{?} 2349 \mathbin{:} 2300 \hspace{1pt} \big]$`\
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't know if there's a difference between \text{} and \mathbin{} in these cases. If not, you could use something like (not tested) \tern{32\ \text{GiB}}{2349}{2300} instead.

@daviddias daviddias added the scope: content Scope: Editing content of the spec label Sep 8, 2020
@yiannisbot
Copy link
Collaborator

@DrPeterVanNostrand @vmx is this still something you want to integrate in the spec? I see the notation section refers to 32GiB sectors only. If yes, then please update to the master branch, so that we can proceed with merging.

cc: @hugomrdias

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
scope: content Scope: Editing content of the spec
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants