Don't force base image manifests to have a mediaType #40776
+7
−7
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
dotnet-issue-labeler
bot
added
Area-Infrastructure
untriaged
baronfel
added
Area-Containers
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The field is optional per the spec, and Docker seems to default to
application/vnd.docker.distribution.manifest.v2+json(see the Docker CLI Manifest handling code) so we should try to handle this as well.Firing this PR off to see what it does to our tests, but a complete PR would need a test to pin the 'able to parse and publish a manifest without a mediaType' behavior down.