Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

simulation for custom scenarios #3010

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 16, 2024
Merged

simulation for custom scenarios #3010

merged 1 commit into from
May 16, 2024

Conversation

mmetc
Copy link
Contributor

@mmetc mmetc commented May 14, 2024

fix #1343

@mmetc mmetc changed the title simulation for local scenarios simulation for custom scenarios May 14, 2024
Copy link

@mmetc: There are no 'kind' label on this PR. You need a 'kind' label to generate the release automatically.

  • /kind feature
  • /kind enhancement
  • /kind refactoring
  • /kind fix
  • /kind chore
  • /kind dependencies
Details

I am a bot created to help the crowdsecurity developers manage community feedback and contributions. You can check out my manifest file to understand my behavior and what I can do. If you want to use this for your project, you can check out the BirthdayResearch/oss-governance-bot repository.

Copy link

@mmetc: There are no area labels on this PR. You can add as many areas as you see fit.

  • /area agent
  • /area local-api
  • /area cscli
  • /area appsec
  • /area security
  • /area configuration
Details

I am a bot created to help the crowdsecurity developers manage community feedback and contributions. You can check out my manifest file to understand my behavior and what I can do. If you want to use this for your project, you can check out the BirthdayResearch/oss-governance-bot repository.

@mmetc mmetc force-pushed the simulation-local-scenario branch from add1095 to 41de4d2 Compare May 14, 2024 12:35
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented May 14, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 81.81818% with 2 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 27.46%. Comparing base (cc63729) to head (d5c0f18).

Files Patch % Lines
pkg/leakybucket/manager_load.go 60.00% 2 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #3010   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   27.46%   27.46%           
=======================================
  Files         399      398    -1     
  Lines       58095    58067   -28     
=======================================
- Hits        15953    15950    -3     
+ Misses      40204    40181   -23     
+ Partials     1938     1936    -2     
Flag Coverage Δ
unit-linux 34.87% <80.00%> (+0.01%) ⬆️
unit-windows 25.53% <63.63%> (+0.01%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@mmetc mmetc force-pushed the simulation-local-scenario branch from d5c0f18 to ba6ea8f Compare May 16, 2024 08:53
@mmetc mmetc merged commit b6253d5 into master May 16, 2024
15 checks passed
@mmetc mmetc deleted the simulation-local-scenario branch May 16, 2024 09:13
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Bug/cscli/crowdsec: simulation mode with custom scenarios
3 participants