New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
ipsec: Safely delete Xfrm state #32450
Merged
julianwiedmann
merged 2 commits into
cilium:main
from
jschwinger233:gray/non-atomic-delete-ipsec-sa
May 17, 2024
Merged
ipsec: Safely delete Xfrm state #32450
julianwiedmann
merged 2 commits into
cilium:main
from
jschwinger233:gray/non-atomic-delete-ipsec-sa
May 17, 2024
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
maintainer-s-little-helper
bot
added
the
dont-merge/needs-release-note-label
The author needs to describe the release impact of these changes.
label
May 10, 2024
jschwinger233
force-pushed
the
gray/non-atomic-delete-ipsec-sa
branch
2 times, most recently
from
May 10, 2024 04:50
4a47d10
to
6ba68e9
Compare
/test |
No functional change, just to make further revision easier. Signed-off-by: gray <[email protected]>
jschwinger233
force-pushed
the
gray/non-atomic-delete-ipsec-sa
branch
from
May 10, 2024 11:12
6ba68e9
to
30f969e
Compare
jschwinger233
added
the
release-note/bug
This PR fixes an issue in a previous release of Cilium.
label
May 10, 2024
maintainer-s-little-helper
bot
removed
the
dont-merge/needs-release-note-label
The author needs to describe the release impact of these changes.
label
May 10, 2024
jschwinger233
added
sig/datapath
Impacts bpf/ or low-level forwarding details, including map management and monitor messages.
area/encryption
Impacts encryption support such as IPSec, WireGuard, or kTLS.
sig/agent
Cilium agent related.
feature/ipsec
Relates to Cilium's IPsec feature
labels
May 10, 2024
/test |
jschwinger233
added
upgrade-impact
This PR has potential upgrade or downgrade impact.
needs-backport/1.13
This PR / issue needs backporting to the v1.13 branch
needs-backport/1.14
This PR / issue needs backporting to the v1.14 branch
needs-backport/1.15
This PR / issue needs backporting to the v1.15 branch
labels
May 10, 2024
rgo3
reviewed
May 13, 2024
jschwinger233
force-pushed
the
gray/non-atomic-delete-ipsec-sa
branch
from
May 14, 2024 04:08
30f969e
to
1eb9e26
Compare
jschwinger233
force-pushed
the
gray/non-atomic-delete-ipsec-sa
branch
from
May 14, 2024 04:11
1eb9e26
to
71f722f
Compare
/test |
rgo3
approved these changes
May 14, 2024
jschwinger233
force-pushed
the
gray/non-atomic-delete-ipsec-sa
branch
from
May 15, 2024 09:50
71f722f
to
a7903f4
Compare
/test |
This patch introduces a workaround to avoid kernel issue when deleting xfrm states. Let's start from the kernel issue. After installing two xfrm states on the same host using below commands (please note the differences on the mark, mask, src): ``` ip x s a src 10.244.1.43 dst 10.244.3.114 proto esp spi 0x00000003 reqid 1 mode tunnel replay-window 0 mark 0x2a450d00 mask 0xffff0f00 output-mark 0xd00 mask 0xffffff00 aead 'rfc4106(gcm(aes))' 0x42a89014074c49243219a20cc87cadd7b9c0d7d1 128 sel src 0.0.0.0/0 dst 0.0.0.0/0 ip x s a src 0.0.0.0 dst 10.244.3.114 proto esp spi 0x00000003 reqid 1 mode tunnel replay-window 0 mark 0xd00 mask 0xf00 output-mark 0xd00 mask 0xffffff00 aead 'rfc4106(gcm(aes))' 0x42a89014074c49243219a20cc87cadd7b9c0d7d1 128 sel src 0.0.0.0/0 dst 0.0.0.0/0 ``` When trying to delete the first xfrm state using the following command, Linux kernel will instead remove the second xfrm state but keep the first: ``` ip x s d src 10.244.1.43 dst 10.244.3.114 proto esp spi 0x00000003 mark 0x2a450d00 mask 0xffff0f00 ``` This causes troubles for cilium upgrade. A real world scenario for cilium upgrade from 1.13.12 to 1.13.14 could be like: 1. Before upgrade, the node has "old-style" xfrm state to catch mark "0xd00/0xf00" for ingress traffic; old bpf programs also set "0xd00" mark to ingress skbs; 2. Upgrade begins, bpf programs are reloaded to new version, thereafter ingress skbs are marked with "0xXXXX0d00"; 3. After a short while, cilium-agent installs new xfrm states to catch traffic with specific mark "0xXXXX0d00"; During window between step 2 and 3, cilium relies on "old-style" xfrm states "0xd00/0xf00" to catch traffic with specific mark "0xXXXX0d00". So far so good. However, in a large scale cluster it's inevitable to receive NodeDeletion events during upgrade due to node churn. Once seeing a NodeDeletion event, cilium-agent will remove the xfrm state for that gone-away remote node. Now we hit the aforementioned kernel issue: cilium-agent tries to delete the xfrm state catching more specific mark, but kernel wrongly removes the one catching general mark. This causing traffic disruption until upgrade completes with all new xfrm states installed. This patch provides an elegant solution at low cost: if cilium-agent wants to remove a xfrm state catching specific mark, it has to temporarily remove the xfrm state catching general mark first and add it back after: 1. Temporarily remove the xfrm states catching the general mark; 2. Remove the xfrm state we really care abot; 3. Add back the temporaily removed one on step 1; Indeed there will be a small window between temporary removing and adding back, but our past test shows the window lasts 200-900µs only, so short that we shoudn't see many drops. Suggested-by: Julian Wiedmann <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: gray <[email protected]>
jschwinger233
force-pushed
the
gray/non-atomic-delete-ipsec-sa
branch
from
May 15, 2024 10:48
a7903f4
to
af478a8
Compare
/test |
pchaigno
approved these changes
May 16, 2024
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
😭
Thanks Gray! Neat pull request!
julianwiedmann
approved these changes
May 16, 2024
maintainer-s-little-helper
bot
added
the
ready-to-merge
This PR has passed all tests and received consensus from code owners to merge.
label
May 16, 2024
jschwinger233
removed
the
upgrade-impact
This PR has potential upgrade or downgrade impact.
label
May 17, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
area/encryption
Impacts encryption support such as IPSec, WireGuard, or kTLS.
feature/ipsec
Relates to Cilium's IPsec feature
kind/bug
This is a bug in the Cilium logic.
needs-backport/1.13
This PR / issue needs backporting to the v1.13 branch
needs-backport/1.14
This PR / issue needs backporting to the v1.14 branch
needs-backport/1.15
This PR / issue needs backporting to the v1.15 branch
ready-to-merge
This PR has passed all tests and received consensus from code owners to merge.
release-note/bug
This PR fixes an issue in a previous release of Cilium.
sig/agent
Cilium agent related.
sig/datapath
Impacts bpf/ or low-level forwarding details, including map management and monitor messages.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Commit messages elaborate details. Although this is to fix an upgrade issue from 1.13, it doesn't harm main.
If the cilium is upgraded from an old version, it's possible a latest version cilium cluster has the old xfrm states left over. In this case, this PR performs unnecessary xfrm churn, but won't affect any traffic.
If the cilium is installed from scratch, it indeed doesn't need this fix at all. In this situation, the
SafelyDeleteXfrmState()
doesn't even cause xfrm churn because it can't find the old style xfrm state to delete.This can be removed along with https://github.com/cilium/cilium/blob/v1.15.4/pkg/datapath/linux/ipsec/ipsec_linux.go#L351.