[SM-923] Migrate Project -> Service Accounts access policy selector

[Thomas-Avery]

Type of change

- [ ] Bug fix
- [X] New feature development
- [ ] Tech debt (refactoring, code cleanup, dependency upgrades, etc)
- [ ] Build/deploy pipeline (DevOps)
- [ ] Other

Objective

This purpose of this PR is to migrate the project → service accounts tab to the new access policy selector.

Depends on the server PR bitwarden/server#3993

Code changes

• bitwarden_license/bit-web/src/app/secrets-manager/models/view/access-policy.view.ts:
  Add view for ProjectServiceAccountsAccessPolicies

• bitwarden_license/bit-web/src/app/secrets-manager/projects/project/project-service-accounts.component.html:
  bitwarden_license/bit-web/src/app/secrets-manager/projects/project/project-service-accounts.component.ts:
  Migrate to the new access policy selector.

• bitwarden_license/bit-web/src/app/secrets-manager/shared/access-policies/access-policy-selector/models/ap-item-value.type.ts:
  Add support for converting into the new view.

• bitwarden_license/bit-web/src/app/secrets-manager/shared/access-policies/access-policy-selector/models/ap-item-view.type.ts:
  Add support for converting from the new view.

• bitwarden_license/bit-web/src/app/secrets-manager/shared/access-policies/access-policy.service.ts:
  Add calls for the new management endpoints.

• bitwarden_license/bit-web/src/app/secrets-manager/shared/access-policies/models/requests/project-service-accounts-access-policies.request.ts:
  Add request model for the new endpoint.

• bitwarden_license/bit-web/src/app/secrets-manager/shared/access-policies/models/responses/project-service-accounts-access-policies.response.ts:
  Add response model for the new endpoints.

Before you submit

• Please add unit tests where it makes sense to do so (encouraged but not required)
• If this change requires a documentation update - notify the documentation team
• If this change has particular deployment requirements - notify the DevOps team
• Ensure that all UI additions follow WCAG AA requirements

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 0% with 96 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 27.71%. Comparing base (2698873) to head (7d5c9ec).

Files	Patch %	Lines
...ects/project/project-service-accounts.component.ts	0.00%	52 Missing ⚠️
...er/shared/access-policies/access-policy.service.ts	0.00%	19 Missing ⚠️
...ccess-policy-selector/models/ap-item-value.type.ts	0.00%	11 Missing ⚠️
...oject-service-accounts-access-policies.response.ts	0.00%	7 Missing ⚠️
...access-policy-selector/models/ap-item-view.type.ts	0.00%	5 Missing ⚠️
.../secrets-manager/models/view/access-policy.view.ts	0.00%	1 Missing ⚠️
...roject-service-accounts-access-policies.request.ts	0.00%	1 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #8789      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   27.74%   27.71%   -0.03%     
==========================================
  Files        2409     2411       +2     
  Lines       69749    69823      +74     
  Branches    12978    12984       +6     
==========================================
  Hits        19349    19349              
- Misses      48898    48972      +74     
  Partials     1502     1502              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[github-actions]

Checkmarx One – Scan Summary & Details – 3736d434-7de9-419c-ad70-4e80c47a65ad

New Issues

Severity	Issue	Source File / Package	Checkmarx Insight
	Angular_Improper_Type_Pipe_Usage	/apps/web/src/app/admin-console/organizations/manage/group-add-edit.component.html: 55	Attack Vector
	Angular_Improper_Type_Pipe_Usage	/apps/web/src/app/admin-console/organizations/manage/group-add-edit.component.html: 36	Attack Vector
	Angular_Improper_Type_Pipe_Usage	/apps/web/src/app/admin-console/organizations/manage/group-add-edit.component.html: 59	Attack Vector

[cd-bitwarden]

These changes look good! I did notice that it's automatically noting that some new lines of code aren't covered by tests, are any of these suggestions it's making important or is it overkill on what it's suggesting to test?

The base branch was changed.

[cd-bitwarden]

Approved 👍