Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Tone feat req99 #100

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Jun 28, 2024
Merged

Tone feat req99 #100

merged 6 commits into from
Jun 28, 2024

Conversation

tonesnotes
Copy link
Contributor

Description of Changes

ARC.ts
ARC broadcaster was not extracting error details into description property, status into code property in all cases.

ARC.test.ts
updated to test broadcast error 460 property extraction.

Linked Issues / Tickets

Closes Feature Request #99

Testing Procedure

New test 'handles error 460' initially called live ARC service to obtain actual error response data format.
This was then captured as a static test with the live format hard wired.

Checklist:

  • [ x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
  • [ n/a] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  • [ x] My changes generate no new warnings
  • [ x] I have updated CHANGELOG.md with my changes
  • [ x] I have run npm run doc and npm run lint one final time before requesting a review
  • [ x] I have run npm version patch so that my changes will trigger a new version to be released when they are merged

@tonesnotes
Copy link
Contributor Author

Added optional more property as originally requested by @ty-everett to forward unparsed response.data object from underlying (ARC) broadcast service provider.

Copy link
Collaborator

@ty-everett ty-everett left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good!

@ty-everett ty-everett merged commit cecf579 into master Jun 28, 2024
8 checks passed
@ty-everett ty-everett deleted the tone-featReq99 branch June 28, 2024 15:11
Copy link
Collaborator

@sirdeggen sirdeggen left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks Tone

@ty-everett ty-everett mentioned this pull request Jun 28, 2024
@rob-tkn
Copy link

rob-tkn commented Jun 28, 2024

Thanks for the quick turnaround.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants