Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update README.rst #8552

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: develop
Choose a base branch
from
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Diff view
Diff view
16 changes: 16 additions & 0 deletions doc/README.rst
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -26,3 +26,19 @@ The process for building the documentation is:
You can perform all of these tasks by running ``make all`` in this
directory. If you have previously built the documentation and want
to regenerate it, run ``make clean`` first.





* This is my Answer for this documentation i tried this solution using some other Ai tools to leverage my work :

It seems like you're encountering an issue with the AWS SDK for Ruby when using the describe_security_groups method. The error message indicates an incompatibility between the group_names and filters options.

The issue appears to arise when you provide both group_names and filters options in the describe_security_groups call. The error message suggests that the provided security group name (group_name) does not exist in the default VPC.

It's important to note that the AWS API documentation indicates that group_ids is a required field if you are not in the default VPC. However, you've observed that this is not the case in your scenario.

This discrepancy between the documented behavior and the actual behavior you're experiencing could indeed indicate a bug in the AWS SDK for Ruby. It might be worth checking the AWS SDK for Ruby's issue tracker or forums to see if others have reported similar issues. Additionally, reaching out to AWS support could provide further insights or assistance in resolving this issue.

In the meantime, you might consider adjusting your code to either use group_ids instead of group_names or to remove the group_names option altogether if it's not necessary for your use case. This might help to work around the issue until a fix is available.