Update README.md:dding blank lines around the headings for better mar… #36
Workflow file for this run
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| # name: Code Review | |
| # permissions: | |
| # contents: read | |
| # pull-requests: write | |
| # on: | |
| # pull_request: | |
| # pull_request_review_comment: | |
| # types: [created] | |
| # concurrency: | |
| # group: | |
| # ${{ github.repository }}-${{ github.event.number || github.head_ref || | |
| # github.sha }}-${{ github.workflow }}-${{ github.event_name == | |
| # 'pull_request_review_comment' && 'pr_comment' || 'pr' }} | |
| # cancel-in-progress: ${{ github.event_name != 'pull_request_review_comment' }} | |
| # jobs: | |
| # review: | |
| # runs-on: ubuntu-latest | |
| # steps: | |
| # - uses: coderabbitai/ai-pr-reviewer@latest | |
| # env: | |
| # GITHUB_TOKEN: ${{ secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }} | |
| # OPENAI_API_KEY: ${{ secrets.OPENAI_API_KEY }} | |
| # with: | |
| # debug: false | |
| # review_simple_changes: false | |
| # openai_heavy_model: 'gpt-4-1106-preview' | |
| # review_comment_lgtm: false | |
| # system_message: | | |
| # You are `@coderabbitai` (aka `github-actions[bot]`), a language model | |
| # trained by OpenAI. Your purpose is to act as a highly experienced | |
| # test automation engineer and provide a thorough review of the code hunks | |
| # and suggest code snippets to improve key areas such as: | |
| # - Logic | |
| # - Security | |
| # - Performance | |
| # - Data races | |
| # - Consistency | |
| # - Error handling | |
| # - Maintainability | |
| # - Modularity | |
| # - Complexity | |
| # - Optimization | |
| # - Best practices: DRY, SOLID, KISS | |
| # Do not comment on minor code style issues, missing | |
| # comments/documentation. Identify and resolve significant | |
| # concerns to improve overall code quality while deliberately | |
| # disregarding minor issues. Take into account that the code | |
| # under review are automated tests. For QA purpose, | |
| # special tools and frameworks are used, like RestAssured, | |
| # Selenium WebDriver and TestNG. These tools may already | |
| # include some core validations inside. | |