update proxysql version

[markuman]

SUMMARY

nightly ci pipeline is regulary failing

https://github.com/ansible-collections/community.proxysql/runs/4186701842?check_suite_focus=true

"msg": "Failure downloading https://github.com/sysown/proxysql/releases/download/v2.0.12/proxysql_2.0.12-ubuntu20_amd64.deb, HTTP Error 404: Not Found"

ansible-devel has moved from ubuntu 18.04 to ubuntu 20.04. But proxysql 2.0.12 was not build/available for ubuntu 20.04.
Therefore we're updating the pipeline to use the latest proxysql release 2.3.2

[Andersson007]

LGTM thank you!

[Andersson007]

generally it would be nice to test against the oldest supported version of ProxySQL as well. Maybe we could implement testing on several distros and several versions? Not sure if it's achievable with GHA but with AZP it definitely is (like in c.postgresql).

[markuman]

generally it would be nice to test against the oldest supported version of ProxySQL as well. Maybe we could implement testing on several distros and several versions? Not sure if it's achievable with GHA but with AZP it definitely is (like in c.postgresql).

Yeah, it's definitely a must-have feature that CI/CD covers more versions and distributions - and mysql connectors :) #75

[markuman]

generally it would be nice to test against the oldest supported version of ProxySQL as well. Maybe we could implement testing on several distros and several versions? Not sure if it's achievable with GHA but with AZP it definitely is (like in c.postgresql).

Yeah, it's definitely a must-have feature that CI/CD covers more versions and distributions - and mysql connectors :) #75

...this was only a hotfix.

[Andersson007]

generally it would be nice to test against the oldest supported version of ProxySQL as well. Maybe we could implement testing on several distros and several versions? Not sure if it's achievable with GHA but with AZP it definitely is (like in c.postgresql).

Yeah, it's definitely a must-have feature that CI/CD covers more versions and distributions - and mysql connectors :) #75

...this was only a hotfix.

Yeah, it was "a nice-to-have-in-future thing":)