Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[DO NOT MERGE] Amendment XLS-34d #2184

Open
wants to merge 102 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Conversation

dangell7
Copy link
Contributor

@dangell7 dangell7 commented Jan 9, 2023

High Level Overview of Change

Adding functionality for XLS-34d Amendment

Context of Change

  • Transactions: Updated Amount - string -> Amount
  • Ledger Object: Updated Amount - string -> Amount
  • FundWallet: Added links to fund the IOUEscrow dev network
  • Test: PaymentChannel: Create, Claim, Fund - Escrow: Create

I added an Issue function on the setup client. I don't like that it runs for each and can move that functionality to the specific test if necessary. Or in the C# client, I issue inside the individual test and will like to refactor that to match.

... paymentChannelTest
await issueIC()

Type of Change

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)
  • Refactor (non-breaking change that only restructures code)
  • Tests (You added tests for code that already exists, or your new feature included in this PR)
  • Documentation Updates
  • Release

Before / After

XRP ONLY for Payment Channel & Escrow / IOU/XRP for Payment Channel & Escrow

Test Plan

Please review the tests and let me know if you see more. There are much more tests in the rippled library. We can definitely adopt them.

I would like to discuss the gateway setup and having access to an issued token in each test suite.

@mvadari
Copy link
Collaborator

mvadari commented Feb 15, 2023

lgtm

@socket-security
Copy link

Socket Security Pull Request Report

👍 No new dependency issues detected in pull request

Pull request report summary
Issue Status
Install scripts ✅ 0 issues
Native code ✅ 0 issues
Bin script confusion ✅ 0 issues
Bin script shell injection ✅ 0 issues
Unresolved require ✅ 0 issues
Invalid package.json ✅ 0 issues
HTTP dependency ✅ 0 issues
Git dependency ✅ 0 issues
Potential typo squat ✅ 0 issues
Known Malware ✅ 0 issues
Telemetry ✅ 0 issues
Protestware/Troll package ✅ 0 issues
Bot Commands

To ignore an alert, reply with a comment starting with @SocketSecurity ignore followed by a space separated list of package-name@version specifiers. e.g. @SocketSecurity ignore [email protected] [email protected]

Powered by socket.dev

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants