-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Removing consider-using-enumerate from lint exclusions and updates #12286
Merged
mtreinish
merged 15 commits into
Qiskit:main
from
joesho112358:removing-consider-using-enumerate-lint-rule
Jun 10, 2024
Merged
Changes from 7 commits
Commits
Show all changes
15 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
52310e3
removing consider-using-enumerate from lint exclusions and updates
joesho112358 61988e5
Merge branch 'main' into removing-consider-using-enumerate-lint-rule
joesho112358 9b0d5bf
Merge branch 'main' into removing-consider-using-enumerate-lint-rule
joesho112358 bfd6a42
Merge branch 'main' into removing-consider-using-enumerate-lint-rule
joesho112358 e27d84f
Merge branch 'main' into removing-consider-using-enumerate-lint-rule
joesho112358 379ec01
Merge branch 'main' into removing-consider-using-enumerate-lint-rule
joesho112358 67ad5ef
updating for lint removal of consider-using-enumerate
joesho112358 c794bad
Merge branch 'main' into removing-consider-using-enumerate-lint-rule
joesho112358 3484125
adding disable lint comment for consider-using-enumerate
joesho112358 ee72f06
updating loops for getting the original, ordered list of qubits in pa…
joesho112358 0f85366
Merge branch 'main' into removing-consider-using-enumerate-lint-rule
joesho112358 1eba896
Merge branch 'main' into removing-consider-using-enumerate-lint-rule
joesho112358 daae416
Merge branch 'main' into removing-consider-using-enumerate-lint-rule
joesho112358 4e866a9
reverting update and adding disable comment
joesho112358 b8279ef
Merge branch 'main' into removing-consider-using-enumerate-lint-rule
joesho112358 File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This looks like a behavioural change to me. Dictionary iteration order is insertion order, but the previous form was specifically looking up in numerical order of the
v
items.The
v
s are ints here (from0
ton-1
) and thek
areQubit
instances.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
ah, i see it now. ok, i'll have to update this