Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We鈥檒l occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[WIP] Output concurrency #146

Draft
wants to merge 3 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Draft

[WIP] Output concurrency #146

wants to merge 3 commits into from

Conversation

ingrinder
Copy link
Collaborator

@ingrinder ingrinder commented Jan 10, 2024

This is an early WIP draft for allowing output concurrency - i.e. entry output can occur before all entries have instantiated, building on the multithreading support. This is something I've had lying around for a few months and got round to rebasing onto current master.

@HorlogeSkynet what do you think of this approach so far? I probably won't get the idea finished for a while. Particularly I thought about putting 923990c in its own PR but I may as well put it in this draft for now.

P.S. this PR will probably get force pushed at some point when rebasing on master again.

I forgot to add the no integrations tag to my commits, my bad!

Description

  • Refactors the way output works in entries slightly - now uses a getter on a property for each entry, which seemed cleaner than the current solution passing output back to a method.
  • Adds a lot of stuff in Output. It's a bit of a mess, still.

Reason and / or context

Often the IP and GPU entries take a little longer on my system, getting faster feedback is nice 馃槃

How has this been tested ?

Only locally run so far.

Types of changes :

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • Typo / style fix (non-breaking change which improves readability)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)

Checklist :

  • [IF NEEDED] I have updated the README.md file accordingly ;
  • [IF NEEDED] I have updated the test cases (which pass) accordingly ;
  • [IF BREAKING] This pull request targets next Archey version branch ;
  • My changes looks good ;
  • I agree that my code may be modified in the future ;
  • My code follows the code style of this project (PEP8).

Replaces callback with property
Building on slight refactoring of output, allow entries to appear as
soon as they are available rather than waiting until all complete.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

1 participant