Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Test 320x240 LCD size #4594

Draft
wants to merge 7 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Draft

Test 320x240 LCD size #4594

wants to merge 7 commits into from

Conversation

philmoz
Copy link
Collaborator

@philmoz philmoz commented Feb 1, 2024

Test setup for potential radios with 320x240 pixel color LCD screens.

Notes:

  • Simulator only, there is no hardware configuration
  • Based on TX16S simulator UI, so simulator looks like TX16S with small screen
  • Touch is currently enabled to make testing easier
  • There are likely to be pages/views that do not display or scale properly, not all of the code has been tested

To use this create a build with PCB=X10 and PCBREV=SMALL_LCD.
In Companion select radio type as 'Test 320x240 LCD'

@philmoz
Copy link
Collaborator Author

philmoz commented Feb 1, 2024

This is based on the 'Color UI refactor' PR so may also include bugs from that PR.

@philmoz philmoz marked this pull request as draft February 1, 2024 21:23
@philmoz philmoz force-pushed the test-320x240 branch 3 times, most recently from 99acf74 to d1c9d29 Compare February 6, 2024 07:28
@philmoz philmoz force-pushed the test-320x240 branch 2 times, most recently from 8048236 to 50657fd Compare February 12, 2024 03:10
@davetheghost
Copy link

davetheghost commented Feb 24, 2024

considering this for a Zorro -- Lol. We'll see

If I may ask, what LCD did you use, bearing which controller, and interface to your TX?

@gagarinlg
Copy link
Member

The Zorro can not handle a color LCD

@philmoz philmoz force-pushed the test-320x240 branch 3 times, most recently from 9bc4afc to 2e26470 Compare March 11, 2024 08:20
@philmoz philmoz force-pushed the test-320x240 branch 3 times, most recently from b86d691 to 2c3b4b5 Compare March 22, 2024 01:32
@philmoz philmoz force-pushed the test-320x240 branch 5 times, most recently from 7b3175a to 5f53ea2 Compare March 29, 2024 09:23
@philmoz philmoz force-pushed the test-320x240 branch 4 times, most recently from 3628d59 to fd54b12 Compare April 6, 2024 01:40
@philmoz philmoz force-pushed the test-320x240 branch 2 times, most recently from 88e5605 to 986b59b Compare April 10, 2024 10:41
@philmoz philmoz force-pushed the test-320x240 branch 2 times, most recently from d994914 to a44df63 Compare April 27, 2024 04:51
@philmoz philmoz force-pushed the test-320x240 branch 2 times, most recently from 22ed93a to 4be3d1e Compare May 2, 2024 23:02
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants