-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[HOLD][npcollector] Fix statsd client #25687
Conversation
998e4bb
to
e478baf
Compare
a0cf488
to
ebd2611
Compare
Test changes on VMUse this command from test-infra-definitions to manually test this PR changes on a VM: inv create-vm --pipeline-id=34535645 --os-family=ubuntu |
Regression DetectorRegression Detector ResultsRun ID: 3ff701ad-2245-4bbc-8c22-fe698c8b38a2 Performance changes are noted in the perf column of each table:
No significant changes in experiment optimization goalsConfidence level: 90.00% There were no significant changes in experiment optimization goals at this confidence level and effect size tolerance.
|
perf | experiment | goal | Δ mean % | Δ mean % CI |
---|---|---|---|---|
➖ | basic_py_check | % cpu utilization | +2.00 | [-0.55, +4.55] |
➖ | uds_dogstatsd_to_api_cpu | % cpu utilization | +0.97 | [-1.90, +3.84] |
➖ | idle | memory utilization | +0.34 | [+0.30, +0.39] |
➖ | file_tree | memory utilization | +0.08 | [-0.04, +0.20] |
➖ | otel_to_otel_logs | ingress throughput | +0.04 | [-0.32, +0.39] |
➖ | uds_dogstatsd_to_api | ingress throughput | +0.01 | [-0.19, +0.21] |
➖ | trace_agent_json | ingress throughput | +0.00 | [-0.01, +0.01] |
➖ | trace_agent_msgpack | ingress throughput | -0.00 | [-0.00, +0.00] |
➖ | tcp_dd_logs_filter_exclude | ingress throughput | -0.03 | [-0.07, +0.01] |
➖ | tcp_syslog_to_blackhole | ingress throughput | -0.71 | [-21.80, +20.38] |
➖ | pycheck_1000_100byte_tags | % cpu utilization | -2.91 | [-7.59, +1.78] |
Explanation
A regression test is an A/B test of target performance in a repeatable rig, where "performance" is measured as "comparison variant minus baseline variant" for an optimization goal (e.g., ingress throughput). Due to intrinsic variability in measuring that goal, we can only estimate its mean value for each experiment; we report uncertainty in that value as a 90.00% confidence interval denoted "Δ mean % CI".
For each experiment, we decide whether a change in performance is a "regression" -- a change worth investigating further -- if all of the following criteria are true:
-
Its estimated |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%, indicating the change is big enough to merit a closer look.
-
Its 90.00% confidence interval "Δ mean % CI" does not contain zero, indicating that if our statistical model is accurate, there is at least a 90.00% chance there is a difference in performance between baseline and comparison variants.
-
Its configuration does not mark it "erratic".
I am not sure what problem this PR is solving. When are you seeing that you get the no-op client? |
@@ -76,6 +76,9 @@ func newNpCollectorImpl(epForwarder eventplatform.Forwarder, collectorConfigs *c | |||
collectorConfigs.pathtestInterval, | |||
collectorConfigs.flushInterval) | |||
|
|||
getStatsdClient := func() ddgostatsd.ClientInterface { | |||
return statsd.Client |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@hmahmood (starting a thread since it's easier to follow discussions)
I am not sure what problem this PR is solving. When are you seeing that you get the no-op client?
When I log the statsd.Client
it displays this:
2024-05-17 08:24:04 PDT | PROCESS | INFO | (comp/networkpath/npcollector/npcollectorimpl/npcollector.go:79 in newNpCollectorImpl) | statsd.Client &statsd.NoOpClient{}
I think it's because the NpCollector component is created before statsd Configure()
is called:
datadog-agent/pkg/process/statsd/statsd.go
Lines 18 to 22 in 939b135
func Configure(host string, port int, create func(string, int, ...statsd.Option) (statsd.ClientInterface, error)) error { | |
var err error | |
Client, err = create(host, port) | |
return err | |
} |
Also, I'm not seeing any statsd metrics being reported due to use of NoOpClient
.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I haven't worked much with fx
-- should we be injecting the statsd client? In general DI frameworks are supposed to solve these configuration ordering issues.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hi @leeavital , I think you are right, statsd client should be injected as component instead of using a global (currently).
I will reach processes team to see if that's something we can do.
Superseded by #25708 |
Superseded by #25708
What does this PR do?
[npcollector] Fix statsd client
statsd.Client
is assigned/configured at runtime, currently we might get theNoOpClient
instead of the actual statsdClient. This PR fixes that issue by wrapping inside a function.datadog-agent/pkg/process/statsd/statsd.go
Lines 13 to 22 in 939b135
Motivation
Additional Notes
Possible Drawbacks / Trade-offs
Describe how to test/QA your changes