Use uWS in Socket.io?

[kurtextrem]

See this issue on why: socketio/engine.io#388
And here how: https://github.com/socketio/engine.io#methods

[lukeed]

We technically could, but the performance aspect doesn't matter at all in JARVIS. Memory efficiency would be the only benefit.

Personally I'd probably swap to ws for this project since it's a little lighter on the install (no binary) and there's still a lot of performance improvement.

That said, we'd need to add a websocket listener on the client, which Sockette could do.

All in all, this is mostly a yak shaver because we don't really gain anything from it. It's not like JARVIS is powering an application server or something -- then it'd matter 😄

[zouhir]

I totally don't like socket.io but I can't prioritise swapping it now as we still in beta and am really rethinking so many things