Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

x32 should really be x86 #12

Open
janisozaur opened this issue Jan 4, 2016 · 1 comment
Open

x32 should really be x86 #12

janisozaur opened this issue Jan 4, 2016 · 1 comment

Comments

@janisozaur
Copy link

On your website you refer to x32 a lot. Sadly, this means something else than what you intend to convey: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/X32_ABI

What you want instead is x86.

@mrexodia
Copy link
Member

mrexodia commented Jan 5, 2016

Yea, I'm aware of the issue. I will look into it and see if it is fixable.
Don't think the name will change though. x86 is ambiguous too. It is a
family of architectures including x86_64. Unambiguous is 32-bit and 64-bit
or 32-bit and x64 debugger but that looks kinda ugly in my opinion.
On Tue, 5 Jan 2016 at 00:25, janisozaur [email protected] wrote:

On your website you refer to x32 a lot. Sadly, this means something else
than what you intend to convey: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/X32_ABI

What you want instead is x86.


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#12.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants