Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[FEATURE] Indicator or Preferential of UAT over ADS-B #200

Open
Tarsi210 opened this issue Aug 28, 2022 · 8 comments
Open

[FEATURE] Indicator or Preferential of UAT over ADS-B #200

Tarsi210 opened this issue Aug 28, 2022 · 8 comments

Comments

@Tarsi210
Copy link

It seems (to me at least) that when an aircraft is transmitting both ADS-B and UAT and I am running tar1090 with both inputs consolidated, tar1090 will show the Source as ADS-B instead of UAT. It would be nice to either be able to preference UAT display over ADS-B (if I choose) or to possibly somehow indicate that the aircraft is transmitting both? Unless I'm missing something. Thanks!

@Squire298
Copy link

if you change the below to point to your "remote" then you will have UAT as the secondary and adsb as the primary.

I use combine1090 and point UAT to that.

Change to yes to enable UAT/978 display in tar1090

ENABLE_978=no

If running dump978-fa on another computer, modify the IP-address as appropriate.

The URL needs to point at where you would normally find the skyview978 webinterface

URL_978="http://127.0.0.1/skyaware978"

my one.

Change to yes to enable UAT/978 display in tar1090

ENABLE_978=yes

If running dump978-fa on another computer, modify the IP-address as appropriate.

The URL needs to point at where you would normally find the skyview978 webinterface

URL_978="http://192.168.1.206/combine1090"

this is the output. https://prnt.sc/2Xg28SzSlDnu

@wiedehopf
Copy link
Owner

Squire that formatting is dreadful .......

Not sure i want to put in a switch for making UAT priority over ADS-B .... i'd recommend just using a separate interface for 978 if that matters to you.

@wiedehopf
Copy link
Owner

Please set

prefer978 = 30;

in config.js and see how that suits you.
If you lose 978 reception and still have 1090 reception, it will show the outdated 978 data for 30 seconds.
Or at least it should i can't really test.

@wiedehopf
Copy link
Owner

Ok, pushed a better version.

prefer978 = 10;

That should be more than sufficient, only use higher values .. well i'm not sure why you would.

@wiedehopf
Copy link
Owner

And if you like it, please make sure your data ends up at https://globe.adsbexchange.com/ as well :)

Just yesterday changed it so that the normal feed client will automatically also feed 978 if it's on the same machine (an extra feed client was necessary previously).

Hmm now i'm curious, you didn't mention initially how you put the 978 into tar1090, i assumed it was via ENABLE_978 in /etc/default/tar1090 and worked on that.
If you feed the 978 into readsb ... it's quite a different story. And quite honestly in that case you're out of luck because readsb will always use the best data source and 1090 is more reliable than 978 by quite a bit.

@Tarsi210
Copy link
Author

Thanks much, @wiedehopf ! And I already feed ADSB-X, have for some time. :)

The reason behind this request is not because I prefer 978 necessarily, but because my 978 antenna/system setup is newer than my 1090. I have a relatively low amount of GA in my area so having a lot of data points to test my system with is difficult to get, to see what I am getting, if it's better or worse in different antenna/LNA configurations, etc. You're right, most of the time I want 1090 but to tweak the system, I want to be able to artificially tweak it the other way, especially when it comes to turning on Persistent mode and watching for the reception patterns over a day/two days/etc. Things like that.

So I very much appreciate it. I've pulled this down and am seeing over the next few days what it looks like, thanks!

@Tarsi210
Copy link
Author

Hmm now i'm curious, you didn't mention initially how you put the 978 into tar1090, i assumed it was via ENABLE_978 in /etc/default/tar1090 and worked on that. If you feed the 978 into readsb ... it's quite a different story. And quite honestly in that case you're out of luck because readsb will always use the best data source and 1090 is more reliable than 978 by quite a bit.

Yes, I used the ENABLE_978; I did change the 1090 over to readsb awhile ago (on your suggestion) and it works great, but the 978 worked out of the box coming through that interface so I left it.

@wiedehopf
Copy link
Owner

wiedehopf commented Aug 30, 2022

If you're not using the separate 978 feed client (which has a separate interface for 978 traffic), be sure to update the normal feed scripts, they now also make sure to feed 978 data.
https://github.com/ADSBexchange/feedclient

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants