Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

TKGm cluster upgrade support #1286

Open
an0nz opened this issue Jan 13, 2022 · 2 comments
Open

TKGm cluster upgrade support #1286

an0nz opened this issue Jan 13, 2022 · 2 comments

Comments

@an0nz
Copy link

an0nz commented Jan 13, 2022

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.

Tenants and admins are unable to upgrade TKGm clusters deployed by CSE 3.1.1

Describe the solution you'd like

The ability to upgrade TKGm clusters from the Container Plugin UI and a remote_template_cookbook_url template that supports TKGm OVA images

Describe alternatives you've considered

A manual way to specify the upgrade path between templates so that the UI plugin worked

Additional context

No response

@an0nz an0nz changed the title TKGm Cluster Upgrade Support TKGm cluster upgrade support Jan 13, 2022
@rocknes
Copy link
Collaborator

rocknes commented Jan 19, 2022

Hi,

TKGm clusters are not upgradable as of now. Future version of CSE will add the support for it.
remote_template_cookbook_url doesn't store TKGm OVAs, only native template definitions are available over there.

Once CSE adds support for multi master TKGm clusters, CSE would also support upgradability of those clusters via rolling upgrade.

Regards
Aritra Sen

@an0nz
Copy link
Author

an0nz commented Jan 20, 2022

Hi @rocknes,
Thanks for the details on future plans, I look forward to multi-master and upgrade capability.

Will existing TKGm clusters deployed by CSE 3.1.1 be upgradeable when this feature is added in a future version?
Any idea how many versions away this capability may be?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants