-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 6
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
shadow-clj support #8
Comments
I don't understand what you mean by "to put the analyzer cache for cljs.core up next to core$macros.cljc.cache.json in the bundled-ns-root." |
@viebel Sure, there will be a PR. But what I was trying to say above is: Here is a somewhat lengthy discussion about the technical details: thheller/shadow-cljs#922 Tldr: Thats currently the only possible solution and it's pretty likely the best one from a ux perspective. So, the deal would be: |
Sounds perfect @ZabelTech ! Let me know if you need further explanation. |
thanks @viebel, I have everything that I need for now. |
Hi @viebel ,
I'm coming over from viebel/klipse#353 (plugging in shadow-cljs support)
Shadow-cljs intentionally hardcodes the compiler flag
dump-core
to false, that means the analyzer-cache will be empty initially and we need to put incljs.core
by hand.For this I need you to put the analyzer cache for
cljs.core
up next tocore$macros.cljc.cache.json
in thebundled-ns-root
.I can make the rest happen then, sounds good?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: