-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 141
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Relationship about joint and dim_to_use? #56
Labels
Comments
There is a unnormalization process behind the code that restores the dimension when the error is calculated.I think that. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Hi there,
I am new to here and I am quite interested in this research topic. However, there is one question I cannot figure out. So I come here for help.
In your code, you throw away dimension whose std<1e-4. Say that there are 99 dims, of which 45 dims are useless, then 54 dims left, right?
As your said:
However, when I print the useless dims index as here:
[10 11 16 17 18 19 20 25 26 31 32 33 34 35 48 49 50 58 59 63 64 65 66 67
68 69 70 71 72 73 74 82 83 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98]
I found that some of them are not correspond to one joint! For example, joint 3 should correspond dimension: 9, 10, 11. However, only dimension 10 and 11 here is dim-to-ignore.
This means, according to ignore these dimension, you simply violent the correspondance of the relationship: one joint ~ 3 dimension. Right?
The last quesion, although input dimension is 54, which DOES NOT REPRESENT 17 joints, the output dimenstion is also 54, which DOES REPRENT 17 joints, am i right?
This is a link from another issue.
Originally posted by @una-dinosauria in #23 (comment)
Originally posted by @jutanke in #46
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: