Replies: 3 comments
-
you may want to wrap the code with backticks. currently it's bearly readable |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
Thanks. I fixed it. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
The current situation is not ideal, but I'm not a big fan of adding more special syntax, especially since there are also various other things one might want to change about an equation. Related: #1921 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
I thought it would be nice to have an option for a no-number block math mode. The syntax could follow what LaTeX does where
Would be a non numbered block equation.
Would be a numbered block equation.
would remain as an in-line equation.
I know it looks like it conflicts a bit with the bold syntax and understand if developers don't like it. But, I think the idea has merit as the present way to do no-numbered equations in the midst of numbered ones is to use something like this
Which is harder to read. But works nonetheless.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions