Time to Abandoned Python-Jose Recommendation in Favour of Supported Packages?

[PhysicallyActive]

First Check

• I added a very descriptive title here.
• I used the GitHub search to find a similar question and didn't find it.
• I searched the FastAPI documentation, with the integrated search.
• I already searched in Google "How to X in FastAPI" and didn't find any information.
• I already read and followed all the tutorial in the docs and didn't find an answer.
• I already checked if it is not related to FastAPI but to Pydantic.
• I already checked if it is not related to FastAPI but to Swagger UI.
• I already checked if it is not related to FastAPI but to ReDoc.

Commit to Help

• I commit to help with one of those options 👆

Example Code

from jose import JWTError, jwt

Description

First of all: Thank you for this great package (I'm using it extensively nowadays and I'm in love with the official docs)! :)

I have a question related to the Security chapter in the official docs; particularly, the chapter relating to JWT tokens. The docs recommend the use of Python-Jose for encoding/decoding JWT, specifically stating:

"This tutorial previously used PyJWT.

But it was updated to use Python-jose instead as it provides all the features from PyJWT plus some extras that you might need later when building integrations with other tools."

However, it appears from GH discussions in the Python-Jose repository that Python-Jose has been abandoned (last release close to 3 years ago and last commit ~1 year ago) - Issues #332, #340, and #341.

Maybe it's time to get back to recommending PyJWT which is still supported and maintained?
Thoughts/Comments?

Thank you all :)

Operating System

Linux

Operating System Details

No response

FastAPI Version

0.110.0

Pydantic Version

2.6.4

Python Version

3.12

Additional Context

No response

[PhysicallyActive]

Most likely a duplicate of #9587

[tiangolo]

Thanks! Indeed, this was just updated here by @estebanx64: #11589 🚀