You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Instead of requiring that the schema, function name, and array of param types be passed separately, consider adding alternate functions for the function-testing assertions that accept a regprocedure parameter. Would be especially useful for function_privs_are(), so it could be called like so:
SELECT function_privs_are(
'blanket.save_thingy( int, text, text, smallint, smallint, numeric )',
'betty', 'EXECUTE', 'betty should have EXECUTE on save_thingy()'
);
The existing functions might be updated to use this version under the hood. Suggested by Jim Nasby.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Instead of requiring that the schema, function name, and array of param types be passed separately, consider adding alternate functions for the function-testing assertions that accept a
regprocedure
parameter. Would be especially useful forfunction_privs_are()
, so it could be called like so:The existing functions might be updated to use this version under the hood. Suggested by Jim Nasby.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: