Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Is it possible to host the code locally? #55

Open
happytm opened this issue Jan 6, 2024 · 4 comments
Open

Is it possible to host the code locally? #55

happytm opened this issue Jan 6, 2024 · 4 comments
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@happytm
Copy link

happytm commented Jan 6, 2024

Thank you for sharing this great project.

Is it possible to host all web files locally on ESP32 itself instead of Github so it does not require internet connection?

Thanks.

@thelastoutpostworkshop thelastoutpostworkshop self-assigned this Jan 6, 2024
@thelastoutpostworkshop thelastoutpostworkshop added the enhancement New feature or request label Jan 6, 2024
@thelastoutpostworkshop
Copy link
Owner

Yes it could be possible, you need a web server setup locally on the same network as the ESP32 to serve the assets of the web application. However, currently the URL to get the assets are hardcoded in the library. I will consider it for a future release as well as instructions on how to do it. I need to do some testing to see how it could work out.

@thelastoutpostworkshop
Copy link
Owner

However, serving the assets from the ESP32 itself is not possible, the assets are too large, right now they are at 26MB.

@happytm
Copy link
Author

happytm commented Jan 6, 2024

OK. understood. Thanks.

@wulph111
Copy link

wulph111 commented May 7, 2024

I would like to see a compile-time option to select the board resources and host the (lower-resolution?) resources for that particular device inside the ESP32 filesystem.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants