You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
# Footnotes[^well-behaved]: Again, Norton actually does not consider ill-behaved idealizations to be idealizations at all, but for now we shall simply pretend he does in order to compare his stance.
{/** TODO: Find out what the name of the position that thinks that boundaries are vague but the line is real are called
* I should probably also write more about vagueness if I want it to be a significant portion of my thesis at all.
* labels: II, vagueness
* milestones:
*/}
[^1]: The analogy is not perfectly sound of course: while most agree that idealizations are in fact fictional, the (non-)existence of general boundaries are much more contentious. The position which claims that such boundary *does* in fact exist is called ==XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX==
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I should probably also write more about vagueness if I want it to be a significant portion of my thesis at all.
milestones:
https://github.com/tefkah/thesis-writing/blob/d39862e3330287db1bda3143e9b24bb567bb07cc/Chapters/II. Idealizations/1. What Is Idealization, and Why Do We Care?.md#L42
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: