Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Find out what the name of the position that thinks that boundaries are vague but... #60

Open
github-actions bot opened this issue Nov 7, 2022 · 0 comments

Comments

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Nov 7, 2022

I should probably also write more about vagueness if I want it to be a significant portion of my thesis at all.

milestones:

https://github.com/tefkah/thesis-writing/blob/d39862e3330287db1bda3143e9b24bb567bb07cc/Chapters/II. Idealizations/1. What Is Idealization, and Why Do We Care?.md#L42

# Footnotes
[^well-behaved]: Again, Norton actually does not consider ill-behaved idealizations to be idealizations at all, but for now we shall simply pretend he does in order to compare his stance.

{/** TODO: Find out what the name of the position that thinks that boundaries are vague but the line is real are called 
    * I should probably also write more about vagueness if I want it to be a significant portion of my thesis at all. 
    * labels: II, vagueness
    * milestones: 
    */} 

[^1]: The analogy is not perfectly sound of course: while most agree that idealizations are in fact fictional, the (non-)existence of general boundaries are much more contentious. The position which claims that such boundary *does* in fact exist is called ==XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX==
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

0 participants